Employees' Text Messaging Is Keeping Corporations Up at Night
Employees' collaboration and communication app usage is outpacing the ability of companies to implement policies. But the not-so-new art of text messaging still has a lot of companies concerned and uninformed, according to a new survey.
November 15, 2019 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Text messages are too hot to handle for many financial companies, according to the "Electronic Communications Compliance Survey Report" by communication archiving provider Smarsh.
Indeed, 77% of the 300 information technology and compliance leaders and practitioners in North America that Smarsh contacted for the survey said text messaging was their greatest compliance risk.
The heightened risk stems from leveraging review platforms that weren't designed for text messages, said Smarsh information governance senior director Robert Cruz. He added, "Now you have communications sprinkled with more emojis and nontext characters. They can be significant and convey sentiment."
While 54% prohibit text messaging for business communications, 40% said their company allows text messaging without an archiving or supervision protocol. Cruz explained there's still a fairly low awareness of solutions that can segregate business and personal text messages.
Instead of leveraging bring-your-own-device (BYOD) technology solutions, companies are more accustomed to hiring a forensic team to provide discovery services on texts and SMS messaging, he noted. However, a majority (69%) of respondents said they had no or low confidence in finding specific messages in a text platform within a reasonable time span.
The low confidence may be triggered by companies deploying slower methods such as leveraging the forensics team, reviewing troves of messages or waiting for a telecommunications service provider's record of communications.
"The problem is that's not easy or fast and in many cases you don't get the information you are looking for," Cruz said.
Despite text messages being a top compliance fear, companies are also struggling to archive popular social media platforms, despite allowing employees to use them for work.
Indeed, 49% said Instagram communication was allowed by the company without specific archiving solutions, above Facebook (28%), collaboration platforms (25%) and LinkedIn and Twitter (20% each).
Cruz noted Instagram provides an array of ways to interact, making capturing all edits, comments and interactions more challenging for companies and archiving solutions.
The survey also found respondents don't have a policy regarding meeting solutions (47%) and collaboration platforms (42%), possibly to the company's detriment.
Cruz noted that this proportion has changed dramatically over the years, with the growing popularity of collaboration tools, including Microsoft Teams, Slack and Cisco Webex. It's "beginning to change how they work, and that is reducing the amount of emails and in-person meetings," he said. "But the problem is, some of these tools get deployed by IT without any guardrails. There's no guidance from IT of what not to do."
However, the report found 37% of companies don't have a policy regarding encrypted messaging apps, perhaps underscoring that corporations are waiting for guidance from regulators before they allow certain communication platforms.
The survey found that one-third of respondents said they were waiting for regulators to enforce regulatory guidance before they determined how they will provide those apps with support. More than half (56%), however, prohibited encrypted and ephemeral apps outright.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 2State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 3Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 4Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 5A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250