Free Legal Advice... on Facebook? These Attorneys Are Giving It a Try
On Oct. 31, Connecticut became the first state to offer attorneys who give free legal advice on Facebook. The model is catching on as St. Louis will begin a similar experiment in January modeled after what Connecticut is doing.
November 21, 2019 at 02:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Nine Connecticut attorneys with various specialties have teamed to offer free advice via Facebook.
And they say it's a way to extend access to justice, reaching potential clients, and offering legal consultation on a platform most Americans already use. To find them, users go to Facebook, search for "Connecticut Lawyer Ask-Us-Anything," and then pose a question to the group. The idea is branching out to St. Louis, where attorneys there will launch a similar group in January.
"Most people just want quick advice, and don't know where to go or turn," said attorney Theresa DeGray, one of the group's founding members. "Facebook gives them a place to go and turn and get a sense of direction."
The online landscape nationally is busy with attorneys offering legal advice on Reddit, Quora, Avvo and other sites. But the attorneys say there had been no such group on Facebook. Until now.
The idea was the brainchild of Jay Ruane, a principal of Shelton-based Ruane Attorneys at Law. No novice to using social media to grow law firm business, Ruane received an ALM Trailblazer Award for social media marketing as head of FirmFlex, which represents attorneys nationally.
Ruane says he's stayed away from television, radio and newspaper advertising, and instead has relied on social media for marketing since 2008. He said he found that through talking to his FirmFlex clients, and doing his own research, there was a market for attorneys to offer their services for free on the popular platform.
"We found that many lawyers were getting direct messages from potential clients," Ruane said. "I figured there was an audience out there on Facebook for people who had legal questions, but were either intimidated, or did not know which lawyer to ask the questions to. I wanted to create a forum that was easy for people to ask a question."
A big advantage of Facebook: Users don't have to offer any additional information before having direct access to the attorneys.
"One of the problems with other platforms, like Reddit or Quora or Avvo, is that people have to register and give up their email address to be able to ask a question," he said. "Those barriers create friction. For those already active on social media, Facebook specifically, they do not need to go through those steps to join the group and ask simple questions." Questions are usually answered in less than a day, Ruane said.
The Facebook group began Oct. 31, and its attorneys are available to answer questions on personal injury, civil rights, disability law, probate, divorce, criminal defense and other practice areas.
Ruane said he's fielded about 15 questions in two weeks.
"We believe we can easily get between 100 and 150 per month, which is a decent number for nine attorneys to go through and parse out," he said.
The page has a disclaimer stating there is no attorney-client relationship until a retainer is signed.
Ethics Considerations
The group's business strategy point to evolving business models, and how these meld with rules governing attorney ethics and practices.
"The ethics rules everywhere reflect a 19th century approach to legal service delivery," said Mark Dubois, a veteran lawyer and Connecticut's former chief disciplinarian who co-wrote a book on legal ethics. "What we have here is a 21st century approach. … Computer-aided communication, the Internet and these access-to-justice issues are all forcing us to figure out new ways to deliver legal information and legal advice and services."
A word of caution: Dubois said the disclaimer the group has on its page is vital, but lawyers need to treat the online relationships as they do face-to-face consultations, including writing fee letters, even if they are not charging any fees.
"Once you start giving one-on-one, individualized legal advice, you run the risk of creating an attorney-client relationship," Dubois said.
Attorneys on the Facebook page say the forum is another way to reach a population that might otherwise have no place to turn for legal advice.
"I grew up in Enfield, which is a real middle-class town, and where many people don't feel they have access to attorneys and legal advice," said Ryan McKeen of Glastonbury-based Connecticut Trial Firm. "We wanted to meet people where they are, and that's Facebook."
Fellow member DeGray agreed.
"I do all the things no one wants to talk about," she said. "I represent people in divorce, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense and disability law. No one wants to talk about legal issues with family and friends, and you won't go to a cocktail party and talk about a divorce or a disability service."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250