Crisis Control: Best Practices for Emergency E-Discovery and Incident Response
A set of steps and best practices that legal teams can follow to ensure thorough and efficient handling of e-discovery in crisis situations.
November 22, 2019 at 09:30 AM
7 minute read
This article appeared in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy, an ALM publication for privacy and security professionals, Chief Information Security Officers, Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Corporate Counsel, Internet and Tech Practitioners, In-House Counsel. Visit the website to learn more.
The day the mine collapsed in the Atacama Desert, the world held its breath. Across time zones and over months, we watched in simultaneous disbelief and hopefulness as rescuers worked to reach the men trapped below. As humanity does in all major crises—energy plant explosions, oil spills, commercial fires—we shared in awe and concern at the first responders working to save lives and contain the damages. In these emergencies, what most don't recognize is that the events span far beyond first response on the ground. Behind the scenes, and long after the news cameras stop rolling, a separate set of teams are triggered, preparing for and managing the extensive legal and investigative processes that follow.
Under the intense emotion and stress inherent in crisis circumstances, legal teams orchestrate short term e-discovery to uncover who knew/knows what relating to the crisis and events leading up to and immediately following it. They assess the breadth of damage and injury in the moment as the crisis unfolds, alongside launching longer-term investigations into what caused the accident and any potential negligence or wrongdoing that occurred. Getting to the facts quickly is critical to prepare for litigation, government investigations and potential criminal charges, and to expedite restitution for victims.
Our teams have worked on a number of crisis e-discovery matters around the world, supporting clients through the lifecycle of complex investigations and litigation that result from these disastrous and often tragic events. In most cases, crisis e-discovery projects are highly likely to involve large data volumes (often double digit terabytes) and span many involved parties (e.g., a committee of plaintiffs of affected parties, governmental agencies, foreign governments, states' attorneys general, etc.). They require tremendous manpower and broad expertise in all practice areas, including data collection, processing, project management, advanced analytics, case management, foreign language review and production. Timelines are often extraordinarily tight, especially in government investigations in which counsel is preparing for congressional testimony and other regulator requests for data.
Another complicating factor is a common desire to collect and review text and social media communications, which can be more prevalent in crisis situations than in other types of cases. When disaster strikes, people today often send a text, chat message or interoffice IM. Investigations may sometimes reveal communication that someone intended to be "off the record," which may provide important insights into the facts of the case.
Best Practices
Through our work with these types of matters, our teams have learned some important lessons. Drawing on these, we have established a set of steps and best practices that legal teams can follow to ensure thorough and efficient handling of e-discovery in crisis situations. These include:
Don't panic, develop a plan: The legal team will be pulled in many different directions, so it is critical for them to take a step back and breathe. This will create space to think carefully about the matter. At this point, it is important to ask questions to understand what will be most important downstream, the full scope of data sources that need to be considered, how they may need to be shared among multiple team and all potential pitfalls that may arise. Counsel should also build a plan for garnering information from key stakeholders, and begin interviews to determine all areas where data may live and all owners of important data.
Rally a strong team: A strong team that can support every facet of the crisis, end-to-end, is essential. This should include a strategic communications team that can develop a clear narrative about what happened, and distribute that information across shareholders, employees, board members and the media. Also bring in experts that can investigate the situation from a regulatory perspective, remediate compliance issues and interface with regulators. A cohesive team that works together across all areas will ensure efficiencies as the crisis continues to evolve, and help maintain a smooth path forward. In one recent matter, consultants from across our organization supported a client in a major crisis — the e-discovery team was mobilized, and in parallel the strategic communications and investigations teams collaborated with the law firm to align on the risk exposures and the details that needed to be communicated to stakeholders and regulators.
Preserve carefully: It is important for relevant data — from computers, mobile devices, hard copies, USB drives, key data systems (such as rig information units for offshore oil, or research data for a product liability case) and other sources — to be preserved for potential use downstream. This doesn't necessarily mean the team must review it, but it needs to be available. Take care to confirm that nothing is "lost," to avoid adverse consequences or inferences made during a proceeding.
Be strategic about unconventional data types: Consider whether text messages, chat strings, voicemails and other communications may come into scope given the particular context. These files can sometimes be looked at together to develop a timeline for a particular actor or group of people. Teams may need to look for documents (not just text messages) saved on mobile devices, and find back-ups when possible. Individuals will often back up their phones to their computer or the cloud, and data will remain there until removed. Gathering iterative back-ups may in some circumstances help fill in the chain of events. Further, forensic experts can help counsel dig into databases of texts to identify gaps in the messages listed in the database to help fill in blanks that may have been created by deletion.
Identify important information: Right away — or better yet in advance of a crisis — a plan for identifying critical information should be put in place. This will allow the team to begin processing for analysis and quick fact finding ahead of investigatory inquiries. One piece of this is to have insight into the key stakeholders that pertain to each piece or set of data and a method by which to track who was issued which device. As early in the process as possible, interview the key stakeholders and determine others who may have more "on the ground" knowledge of how something was used, where data was saved, etc., in the course of business.
Enable agility: Things can change quickly in these matters, and counsel needs to be prepared to endure the changing tides of the investigations and litigation. Working with outside experts that can provide on-the-ground support is key. This provides collaborative support and experienced backing for the teams dealing with the actual crisis. A general best practice is for the in-house team and all outside providers to maintain frequent touchpoints with each other, regulators and opposing counsel to keep things moving forward smoothly.
Lawyers that have experienced these situations, or those that work within industries subject to major accidents, know that emergencies require them to mobilize quickly. Without an effective plan, counsel will find it much more difficult to bear the stress and emotional strain of the ordeal, which can lead to trickle-down implications for the company, its partners and the people impacted by the crisis. But following a playbook of key steps can make a big difference in ensuring everyone stays calm, gathers as much information about the incident as possible and is able to respond in a timely way.
Andrew Johnston is a senior managing director in the discovery practice within the technology segment at FTI Consulting. As an expert in e-discovery technology, he helps clients across the lifecycle of the discovery process, including the review and production of electronic data. He is based in Wayne, Pennsylvania.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1King & Spalding Snags Restructuring Duo From Alston & Bird
- 228 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 3Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 4EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 5Bar Report - Feb. 3
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250