Lawyers Leveraging Less Social Media to Balance Ethics Rules, Time Constraints
Navigating social media isn't quite so straightforward when you're a lawyer. Lawyers must consider any confidentiality or professional conduct rules before they post, making such networks too time-consuming for some to maintain.
November 27, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
If you want to find a lawyer on social media, your best bet is on LinkedIn, according to multiple surveys. LinkedIn is currently popular in a profession that must weigh ethical rules and client confidentiality before every post, while ease of use is top of mind.
The American Bar Association's recent Legal Technology Survey Report listed LinkedIn as the top social network leveraged by lawyers for professional purposes, at 90% of respondents. The 2019 LTN Tech Survey, meanwhile, reported 97% of respondents reported using LinkedIn, with a noticeable decline for other platforms. The LTN survey also found 84% of respondents use Twitter, followed by Facebook (66%), Instagram (16%) and Slack (5%). Meanwhile, ephemeral video and picture posting app Snapchat wasn't used by any respondents for social networking.
Observers said lawyers' social media use can be influenced by professional ethics rules, but most commonly it's the ease of posting content that skews usage rates to specific platforms.
"Attorneys have to be careful about using social media or any platform, but particularly social media. Because it's so quick and easy, lawyers must respect the privacy of clients and not convey private information about their clients," said Charles Mudd Jr., head of Mudd Law.
"They need to be very careful about constructing what can be perceived as advice," Mudd said, also adding that "an attorney needs to be very careful about making representations that can be construed as predictions of success."
Lawyers' professional conduct rules, such as those in New York, may require a disclaimer or certain language that makes posting on Twitter or other social media platforms less appealing.
"I think some firms are concerned about appearing as if they are engaged in advertisement," said Andrew Lustigman, chairman of Olshan Frome Wolosky's advertising, marketing and promotions group. "I think it's somewhat shortsighted because professional networking, at least for the attorneys I know, is an integral part of their business."
Indeed, when balancing professional conduct requirements and ease of posting, LinkedIn's hub of professionals in vast industries and 40,000-character post limits currently makes it the go-to site for establishing thought leadership. Instagram and YouTube, meanwhile, require a hands-on marketing strategy and post-production, which makes them less tempting to lawyers.
Legal Marketing Association president Cynthia Voth noted Am Law 200 and larger firms, including DLA Piper, are beginning to leverage Instagram to highlight practices that have exciting imagery, such as retail, transportation and tourism. Law firms with less image-friendly practices can also leverage Instagram and YouTube to tout community involvement, diversity and culture within the firm, she said.
"It's a visual," Voth said. "Firms have to be thoughtful about the images they are using and what they are trying to achieve with that."
Meanwhile, during lawyers' quest to become thought leaders in a particular practice, Twitter's 280-word character limit isn't very appealing.
"I think one of the reasons with Twitter might be that there is difficulty, given the short amount of space, to substantially convey a lot of information. And lawyers like to convey a lot of information, typically," Mudd said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Consumer Protection Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Irritating Eye Serum
- 2COVID-19 Was Still Relevant in Securities Class Actions During 2024, Report Says
- 3After Botched Landing of United Airlines Boeing 767, Unlikely Plaintiff Sues Carrier
- 4DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 5No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250