Lawyers Leveraging Less Social Media to Balance Ethics Rules, Time Constraints
Navigating social media isn't quite so straightforward when you're a lawyer. Lawyers must consider any confidentiality or professional conduct rules before they post, making such networks too time-consuming for some to maintain.
November 27, 2019 at 11:30 AM
3 minute read
If you want to find a lawyer on social media, your best bet is on LinkedIn, according to multiple surveys. LinkedIn is currently popular in a profession that must weigh ethical rules and client confidentiality before every post, while ease of use is top of mind.
The American Bar Association's recent Legal Technology Survey Report listed LinkedIn as the top social network leveraged by lawyers for professional purposes, at 90% of respondents. The 2019 LTN Tech Survey, meanwhile, reported 97% of respondents reported using LinkedIn, with a noticeable decline for other platforms. The LTN survey also found 84% of respondents use Twitter, followed by Facebook (66%), Instagram (16%) and Slack (5%). Meanwhile, ephemeral video and picture posting app Snapchat wasn't used by any respondents for social networking.
Observers said lawyers' social media use can be influenced by professional ethics rules, but most commonly it's the ease of posting content that skews usage rates to specific platforms.
"Attorneys have to be careful about using social media or any platform, but particularly social media. Because it's so quick and easy, lawyers must respect the privacy of clients and not convey private information about their clients," said Charles Mudd Jr., head of Mudd Law.
"They need to be very careful about constructing what can be perceived as advice," Mudd said, also adding that "an attorney needs to be very careful about making representations that can be construed as predictions of success."
Lawyers' professional conduct rules, such as those in New York, may require a disclaimer or certain language that makes posting on Twitter or other social media platforms less appealing.
"I think some firms are concerned about appearing as if they are engaged in advertisement," said Andrew Lustigman, chairman of Olshan Frome Wolosky's advertising, marketing and promotions group. "I think it's somewhat shortsighted because professional networking, at least for the attorneys I know, is an integral part of their business."
Indeed, when balancing professional conduct requirements and ease of posting, LinkedIn's hub of professionals in vast industries and 40,000-character post limits currently makes it the go-to site for establishing thought leadership. Instagram and YouTube, meanwhile, require a hands-on marketing strategy and post-production, which makes them less tempting to lawyers.
Legal Marketing Association president Cynthia Voth noted Am Law 200 and larger firms, including DLA Piper, are beginning to leverage Instagram to highlight practices that have exciting imagery, such as retail, transportation and tourism. Law firms with less image-friendly practices can also leverage Instagram and YouTube to tout community involvement, diversity and culture within the firm, she said.
"It's a visual," Voth said. "Firms have to be thoughtful about the images they are using and what they are trying to achieve with that."
Meanwhile, during lawyers' quest to become thought leaders in a particular practice, Twitter's 280-word character limit isn't very appealing.
"I think one of the reasons with Twitter might be that there is difficulty, given the short amount of space, to substantially convey a lot of information. And lawyers like to convey a lot of information, typically," Mudd said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250