Wait on That Present: Firms Face Difficult Season With Holiday Hackers
Speed is critical for law firms in the cyber incident response business, but the holidays can present some unique challenges to attorneys and clients alike as they attempt to combat opportunistic hackers.
December 03, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
While everyone else is hanging their stockings by the chimney with care this Christmas, response teams at law firms across the country may be busy checking their emails and voice messages for news of an errant cyber incident.
Many of those practices have been developed to respond to a breach, ransomware or other intrusion at the drop of a hat, 365 days a year. Holidays, however, may be like red meat to bad actors looking to capitalize on corporate vacations and an influx of financial (aka shopping) activity, all the while posing some unique logistical challenges to the attorneys tasked with responding.
"Holidays tend to be the biggest time [for cyber incidents] because the thinking is that the security teams are not at their computers — they are home. IT people aren't there to see weird stuff happening," said Christopher Ballod, a partner with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith.
He noted there tends to be a big spike in cyber incidents in the week leading up to Christmas, which then trails off as the calendar approaches New Year's Day (even hackers need vacations).
What this means for privacy and cybersecurity teams varies from law firm to law firm. Ballod, for instance, indicated that Lewis Brisbois tends to beef up the number of responders on call over the holidays.
The resources that are needed run the gamut from bodies monitoring inquiries that come in over email or telephone lines to people who can run the necessary conflict check required before a lawyer can officially take on the case.
"It's like an arms race with incident response. If you can't respond in 15 minutes with 'conflicts are clear and we're ready to jump on a call,' you're really not that helpful to the people who are in crisis," Ballod said.
Still, rapid-response time isn't exactly an alien concept to law firms. DLA Piper, for example, has two attorneys on call every weekend to handle any cyber incidents that clients may bring to their doorstep.
Jim Harper, co-chairman of the firm's global cybersecurity practice, doesn't expect to make any changes in anticipation of the holiday season.
To be sure, not all firms are anticipating a bundle of yuletide cyber fires.
Christopher Hart, co-chairman of the privacy and cybersecurity group at Foley Hoag, has noticed an uptick in the number of incidents that tend to occur this time of year, but indicated that he would be surprised to receive any calls over the Christmas holiday since most clients will be away from their desks.
Those absences can make it difficult to organize an effective and quick response even if a cyber incident is brought to the attention of an attorney. For example, while many organizations may have put a breach response plan in place, Hart has yet to see one that specifically accounts for the holidays and the ensuing absence of key decision-makers.
"It is harder. … Clients themselves want to take their own vacations," Hart said.
It's not just the corporate vice presidents who may be off singing Christmas carols in parts unknown. Other key partners that law firms may rely on in the aftermath of a cyber incident—vendors such as forensics companies—may be experiencing their own holiday-related slowdowns.
"When they try and get the resources they need, sometimes that just isn't available to them. So it's really a ballet that we have to orchestrate all while staying completely calm for the client," Ballod of Lewis Brisbois said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1High Court Rejects 'Heightened' Standard for Employers Defending FLSA Cases
- 2Case With 'Serious Consequences for Corporate Law' Heads to Texas Supreme Court
- 3Oil Co. Alleges Plot to Drive Away Competition in NYC's Liquid Fuel Market
- 4Takeaways From Day One of Pam Bondi’s Confirmation Hearing
- 5Greenberg Traurig, Holland & Knight Leaders Expect AI Investments to Jump in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250