'Skills Over Schooling': What Makes a Good Legal Ops Applicant?
As part of the Legalweek 2020 Q&A series, Legaltech News speaks with Richard Robinson, director of legal operations and litigation Support at Toyota, on skills legal ops professionals need to have, common misconceptions in legal technology, and more.
December 04, 2019 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
The legal operations space is one of the most unique and exciting you'll find in the entire legal profession. It's an interesting mix in that it's crucial, with legal departments continuously acting more like a business, but also nascent with many departments just beginning to ramp up an operations function. That means, for those looking at switching careers and finding jobs in the space, now may be the time to strike.
As part of the run-up to Legalweek 2020, Legaltech News is chatting with a number of speakers from this year's sessions to know. Today's Q&A is with Richard Robinson, director of legal operations and litigation Support at Toyota. His Legaltech session "Career Up! LegalOps for eDiscovery Professionals & Tech Wonky Attorneys" will take place on Wednesday, February 5, at 11 a.m.
The questions and responses below have been edited for clarity.
Legaltech News: What do you think legal tech looks like in 10 years? What will be the biggest opportunities and challenges?
Richard Robinson: I believe that in ten years, legal technology will have continued to progress in many areas, including automation, artificial intelligence, data compression and data delivery, making the legal professional of the next decade more mobile and agile than ever. The challenge, clearly, will be to keep up with the advances, but for those who do, the opportunities will be boundless.
What is the biggest misconception you think still persists about legal technology?
The biggest persistent misconception is that technology is designed to replace jobs. Legal technology is designed to enhance the practice of law, enabling the tech-savvy practitioner to manage bigger tasks with more data in less time and at a lower cost.
For somebody looking at legal ops as a career path, what's one thing they might not expect when applying, but absolutely should know?
A lot of legal ops roles are being created in a vacuum. Just because a job description may have some "requirements" that are not necessarily on your resume, don't rule them out. Many times, the right applicant will help define the role.
Do you prefer applicants with a JD? MBA? Tech certifications? Or is it a matter of skills over schooling?
I absolutely look for skills over schooling. The best candidates for e-discovery and legal ops roles have a strong understanding of law, technology and business. Where that knowledge is derived from is less important than the quality of the knowledge and the demonstrated ability to use all three.
What are some of the skills you've seen in legal ops professionals that lend to a higher probability of success?
There are three pillars of legal operations: people, process and technology. The most successful professionals in the space are those with a passion for solving problems, an ability to grasp new and ever-changing technology and, perhaps most importantly, an ability to communicate those things with non-technical professionals in a way they can understand.
What do you hope attendees take away from your Legalweek session?
My session is about expanding your horizons and being ready for what happens next in your career. If I were to hope for one thing for attendees of my session to take away, it would be that their eyes are opened to the career building opportunities that already exist around them or just outside their existing sphere of influence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Paul Weiss, Trailblazer for U.S. Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
- 2Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 3Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
- 4$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 5Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250