New Year, New Technology: Law Firms Turning to Cloud Technology for Increased Data Security
Law firms should step up their adoption of enterprise cloud technology platforms to help them avoid data breaches that are costly not only in terms of financial loss, but also in damage to reputation and client relationships.
December 10, 2019 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
|
Law firms are slowly making the shift to enterprise cloud-based platforms. This trend should pick up steam in 2020 as more and more firms look to leverage the technology to increase the security of their client data as well as lower costs, increase productivity and boost client satisfaction.
Cloud technology is already a mainstay in most enterprises today, but law firms are taking a more cautious approach in adopting this technology. According to the 2018 Legal Technology Survey Report by the American Bar Association, "cloud usage in 2018 bumped up very slightly, from 52% to 54.6%."
Despite this slow rate of adoption, law firms recognize the importance of cloud technology to their industry. A recent report by the International Legal Technology Association which surveyed 537 law firms, representing 116,000 attorneys, ranked cloud as the number one technology trend they believe will create "significant change or be a major factor in the legal technology profession." Even with recognition of cloud-based platforms as an efficient, scalable, low-cost way to use legal technology, adoption of this technology has been slowed by lingering concerns about confidentiality and security.
Law firms house a great deal of sensitive client information and are understandably concerned about the IT security of any technology solution they implement. However, many firms still think that legacy on-premise IT solutions are the most effective way to safeguard client data. The fact is that maintaining a secure on-premise IT solution is costly and complex. With these solutions, a firm not only has to implement the technical solution but also maintain proper security, which often takes a tremendous amount of knowledge, effort, and money.
As hackers become more sophisticated, it is increasingly challenging for law firms to keep up with security measures. In-house IT professionals at firms have found it very difficult, if not impossible, to keep every piece of hardware and software up to date, ensuring security settings are correctly applied and audited regularly and having a backup system in case of a failure or attack. Few firms have the personnel or resources to stay on top of this ever-changing cybersecurity landscape.
Concerns around cybersecurity have reached a fever pitch with the continued spate of publicized incursions, including the WannaCry ransomware attack in May 2017, which highlighted the potential dangers of using an on-premise IT solution.
The unfortunate reality is that cybersecurity threats like this are becoming more and more common. According to Norton, data breaches have run at a record pace in 2019 with 4.1 billion records breached and 3,800 publicly disclosed breaches. Law firms are not immune to these data breaches. According to the American Bar Association's 2018 report on cybersecurity, 23% of respondents overall reported that their firm had experienced a data breach at some time.
These statistics make a strong case for firms to leave behind their hesitancy about moving to cloud technology. Law firms should step up their adoption of enterprise cloud technology platforms to help them avoid data breaches that are costly not only in terms of financial loss, but also in damage to reputation and client relationships.
Making the move to cloud computing platforms provides firms with significant security advantages, including:
- Support by a large team of experts who make maintaining a secure IT environment their business;
- Multiple layers of authentication to minimize unauthorized access;
- Cloud isolation from individual devices (e.g. computers, phones and tablets) used by firm employees to keep the firm's files and data secure if one or more of these devices become infected with malware; and
- Comprehensive backup and recovery plans to prevent the loss of files and data in the event of a cyberattack or a physical disaster.
However, as law firms consider moving their files and data to the cloud in the new year, they should understand that this information is only as secure as protection measures offered by their provider. Before selecting an enterprise cloud platform provider, firms should ask their provider about:
Multi-Factor Authentication: Simply using username/password as a login credential is no longer enough to ensure secure access by authorized personnel. Ask about additional authentication methods to supplement the username/password, such as a physical token, a password card, a digital certificate, biometry or SMS password.
Access Management Policy: Make sure to ask whether or not the cloud-computing service platforms allow the firm to set access rights for each individual user so that employees, contractors or clients can only access information relevant to their roles.
Log Management: Logs are not only for compliance—they also help monitor suspicious activities and aid in forensic investigations in case there's a breach. Make sure the cloud service provider can keep track of every user that logs into the system and every document viewed and be able to provide the firm with this information upon request.
Data Backup and Recovery: A top-tier cloud service provider should have a comprehensive backup and recovery plan with multiple redundancies built in to ensure that the firm's data is secure whether there's a cyberattack or physical disaster. Ask if the provider has a well-designed recovery plan that will allow the firm to get up and running again with minimum downtime.
Vulnerability Analysis: Firms should also ask if a provider routinely carries out vulnerability analyses to ensure the security of the system. These analyses are important because they help the provider stay on top of security measures and ahead of malicious hackers.
Security Standards Compliance: Security standards for cloud computing are fast evolving. Make sure a cloud service provider is adhering to industry standards (e.g. SOC 2).
These are some of the key questions law firms should ask to understand a cloud provider's security model. The answers can help firms make an informed selection of a provider that best meets their data protection and security requirements.
The law firm shift to cloud technology will continue in 2020. The new year will see more and more firms embracing the technology not only to make their data more secure, but also to help streamline their operations and increase productivity and growth.
Travis Howe is the Chief Information Security Officer for Litify, a secure, extensible and rapidly evolving legal technology platform. Howe has over three decades of experience and has held several leadership positions in information security and privacy, including Conga, Department of Energy, Intrado, and US Navy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250