Law Firm IT Departments Are Holiday-Ready
Humans may remain law firm cybersecurity's biggest vulnerability over the holidays even as IT departments exist in a constant state of readiness.
December 16, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
Credit: Khakimullin Aleksandr/Shutterstock.com
Holidays may be a popular time for bad cyber actors looking to capitalize on empty offices and vulnerable infrastructures, but while a law firm's breach response team may see a little extra traffic, the IT department seems unlikely to break a sweat.
The good news is that aside from the way that software updates or new system rollouts are scheduled, the holidays don't seem to present any significant new curveballs to law firm cybersecurity personnel. However, that level of confidence doesn't come without strings: Many law offices have learned to operate under the assumption that an attack can happen at any time, 365 days a year.
Neeraj Rajpal, chief information officer at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, indicated that the level of cybersecurity preparation may not have been nearly as high across the industry 10 years ago. But times—and threats—change.
"We are targets all of the time, so I don't think that anything changes over the holidays. To be candid, we are constantly on edge. As I said, the bad guys have to be successful just once. We have to be successful all of the time," Rajpal said.
That includes Christmas and New Year's Day. For example, even when the office is empty, Stroock has automated security tools in place that can detect any unusual activity on its network. As for the human factor, personnel are also on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
"We've done table-top exercises. We know what it's going to be like if something does happen. I don't want to seem overconfident because that's not the right thing to say, but we are ready. We are as ready as ready can be," Rajpal said.
Beau Mersereau, director of legal technology solutions at Fish & Richardson, echoed that confidence, citing a year-round supply of caution and preparation. While there aren't any significant changes made to the firm's cybersecurity posture, there is an effort made not to deploy any new software or tech around the holidays since Christmas vacation is generally a bad time to accidentally break something.
"We don't want to take anything down and mess up someone's holiday," Mersereau said.
Which is not to say that law firm cybersecurity personnel won't still have to be on their toes. James McKenna, chief information officer at Fenwick & West, pointed out that remote access activity typically increases over the holidays since people are either traveling or working from home.
He indicated this can often lead to people calling in for help more often, which requires a certain mindfulness from the people manning the response line given that this time of the year tends to see a lot phishing attacks.
"It becomes that much more critical to verify that a caller is whom they report to be," McKenna said.
Speaking of traveling lawyers, it may also be helpful for attorneys to give their IT department a heads-up if they'll be logging into the network from an exotic vacation destination at some point over the holiday. According to Frank Gillman, a principal at Vertex Advisors Group and a former chief information security officer at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, that simple tip can prevent false alarms going off in the IT department.
"You let your IT department know that you might be connecting from Uzbekistan. because on a normal day I would look at that and go, 'Hey, what the hell is going on? Why are we seeing traffic coming from here or there?'" Gillman said.
When he was at Lewis Brisbois, Gillman said the IT department would send out cybersecurity reminders to employees in advance of the holidays. Chief on that list was the suggestion not to blend personal and professional identities, which can happen as busy attorneys attempt to round out their gift shopping online.
Per Gilman, there's an element of risk at play every time a lawyer unnecessarily extends their professional profile on the internet.
"I think it's good to discourage delivery of gifts to the office because there's just so much potential for misuse," Gillman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1On The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
- 2Is the Collateral Order Doctrine About to Have a 'Brat Summer'?
- 3Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders
- 4Legaltech Rundown: Davis Wright Tremaine Announces CodeX Partnership, AAA Brings on Maya Markovich as VP, and More
- 5State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250