Law Firm IT Departments Are Holiday-Ready
Humans may remain law firm cybersecurity's biggest vulnerability over the holidays even as IT departments exist in a constant state of readiness.
December 16, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
|
Holidays may be a popular time for bad cyber actors looking to capitalize on empty offices and vulnerable infrastructures, but while a law firm's breach response team may see a little extra traffic, the IT department seems unlikely to break a sweat.
The good news is that aside from the way that software updates or new system rollouts are scheduled, the holidays don't seem to present any significant new curveballs to law firm cybersecurity personnel. However, that level of confidence doesn't come without strings: Many law offices have learned to operate under the assumption that an attack can happen at any time, 365 days a year.
Neeraj Rajpal, chief information officer at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, indicated that the level of cybersecurity preparation may not have been nearly as high across the industry 10 years ago. But times—and threats—change.
"We are targets all of the time, so I don't think that anything changes over the holidays. To be candid, we are constantly on edge. As I said, the bad guys have to be successful just once. We have to be successful all of the time," Rajpal said.
That includes Christmas and New Year's Day. For example, even when the office is empty, Stroock has automated security tools in place that can detect any unusual activity on its network. As for the human factor, personnel are also on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
"We've done table-top exercises. We know what it's going to be like if something does happen. I don't want to seem overconfident because that's not the right thing to say, but we are ready. We are as ready as ready can be," Rajpal said.
Beau Mersereau, director of legal technology solutions at Fish & Richardson, echoed that confidence, citing a year-round supply of caution and preparation. While there aren't any significant changes made to the firm's cybersecurity posture, there is an effort made not to deploy any new software or tech around the holidays since Christmas vacation is generally a bad time to accidentally break something.
"We don't want to take anything down and mess up someone's holiday," Mersereau said.
Which is not to say that law firm cybersecurity personnel won't still have to be on their toes. James McKenna, chief information officer at Fenwick & West, pointed out that remote access activity typically increases over the holidays since people are either traveling or working from home.
He indicated this can often lead to people calling in for help more often, which requires a certain mindfulness from the people manning the response line given that this time of the year tends to see a lot phishing attacks.
"It becomes that much more critical to verify that a caller is whom they report to be," McKenna said.
Speaking of traveling lawyers, it may also be helpful for attorneys to give their IT department a heads-up if they'll be logging into the network from an exotic vacation destination at some point over the holiday. According to Frank Gillman, a principal at Vertex Advisors Group and a former chief information security officer at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, that simple tip can prevent false alarms going off in the IT department.
"You let your IT department know that you might be connecting from Uzbekistan. because on a normal day I would look at that and go, 'Hey, what the hell is going on? Why are we seeing traffic coming from here or there?'" Gillman said.
When he was at Lewis Brisbois, Gillman said the IT department would send out cybersecurity reminders to employees in advance of the holidays. Chief on that list was the suggestion not to blend personal and professional identities, which can happen as busy attorneys attempt to round out their gift shopping online.
Per Gilman, there's an element of risk at play every time a lawyer unnecessarily extends their professional profile on the internet.
"I think it's good to discourage delivery of gifts to the office because there's just so much potential for misuse," Gillman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250