As Legal Tech Incubators Multiply, Past Entrants Reveal What Makes a Successful Engagement
Unlike some general tech incubators, legal tech incubators provide consistent quality and industry insights, past incubator participants say. Still, some question whether these incubators can help startups achieve their full profit potential.
December 17, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
After Deloitte joined the legal tech incubator scene earlier this month, the space is quickly crowding with potential opportunities to stoke and scale legal innovation. Meanwhile, more incubators means a wider assortment for startups to pick from, and past participants say new entrants into the legal tech incubator arena will have to meet high expectations.
Indeed, legal tech startups that have taken part in incubators and accelerators told Legaltech News their experiences were worthwhile and beneficial. Though some critics warn that law firms and Big Four legal tech incubators don't truly assist companies in reaching peak profit potential, past legal tech incubator participants say they gained substantial industry insights and assistance from their program. But it's an experience those participating in general tech incubators don't all share.
Haley Altman, Litera Microsystems' general manager of transaction management, understands the potential horrors faced by startups joining an incubator. When she was an attorney at Ice Miller, Altman counseled tech startups that were selected to participate in incubators. Some clients said incubators did not clearly state the goals of how they will advance a company. In turn, there wasn't a clear value that came out of it, she said.
In contrast, Altman said when she was navigating her own startup Doxly through the incubator arena, she had a great experience leveraging the business expertise of venture studio High Alpha and the industry insights of Dentons' Nextlaw Labs.
"There are a lot of incubators and they can all help you, but some of them aren't where you want them to be," Altman said. "But I was fortunate."
She added that "when you are looking for investors, you want to look at people who can help you in different ways. In High Alpha, we got a lot of expertise in building a company," Altman said. Dentons, meanwhile, provided subject matter expertise about law firms, including how to sell to law firms and lawyer feedback.
Altman's sentiments were shared by other legal tech startups Legaltech News contacted for this article. All noted that while the incubators take them away from directly selling or developing their product or service, the business advice and client connections gained from the program makes it worthwhile.
"When I got in, it was the right thing for my company, it was 100% worth it," said Rachel Shapiro. The founder and president of Medilenz, Shapiro's company participated in LexisNexis's accelerator in 2017. "The time I didn't spend cold calling, marketing [in the incubator] got me back a thousand times more. It was invaluable."
Shapiro noted such accelerators and incubators are competitive and selective, but ultimately the company's success doesn't hinge on participation.
"There are companies that fail anyway so it's hard to say they shouldn't have failed because of the incubator. … It's not like you just sign up. You have to apply, be vetted and state your reason for wanting to be in it, and they reach out to a lot of companies," she explained.
But David Holme, the CEO and co-founder of alternative legal service provider Exigent who recently started an evergreen fund for legal tech, said startups won't grow substantially with these Big Four and Big Law incubators.
"The law firms have no investment experience at all. They definitely haven't demonstrated being more efficient, there's no real drive for efficiencies, technology is one of those things you want to put on brochures and banners," Holmes said. He added that the Big Four "are less legacy than law firms. They are probably a step up from firms, but they too want to use [the startups]. They aren't investors."
Investments in startups are a small drop in the bucket for the Big Four, Holme explained. "For the venture capitalists, their very livelihood would depend on the return. For Deloitte: Our biscuit bill is half a million. We will put it into legal tech and tell them we are a venture fund, and will use their software and we will most certainly profit off of you before you do."
Still, for many legal tech startups, incubators can represent a chance for valuable feedback and face time with potential clients and those in the field.
"There's no quick wins in this world, you have to find the right people to work with to get where you want to be," Altman said. "Be thoughtful about what you want to get out of these organizations."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250