As Legal Tech Incubators Multiply, Past Entrants Reveal What Makes a Successful Engagement
Unlike some general tech incubators, legal tech incubators provide consistent quality and industry insights, past incubator participants say. Still, some question whether these incubators can help startups achieve their full profit potential.
December 17, 2019 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
After Deloitte joined the legal tech incubator scene earlier this month, the space is quickly crowding with potential opportunities to stoke and scale legal innovation. Meanwhile, more incubators means a wider assortment for startups to pick from, and past participants say new entrants into the legal tech incubator arena will have to meet high expectations.
Indeed, legal tech startups that have taken part in incubators and accelerators told Legaltech News their experiences were worthwhile and beneficial. Though some critics warn that law firms and Big Four legal tech incubators don't truly assist companies in reaching peak profit potential, past legal tech incubator participants say they gained substantial industry insights and assistance from their program. But it's an experience those participating in general tech incubators don't all share.
Haley Altman, Litera Microsystems' general manager of transaction management, understands the potential horrors faced by startups joining an incubator. When she was an attorney at Ice Miller, Altman counseled tech startups that were selected to participate in incubators. Some clients said incubators did not clearly state the goals of how they will advance a company. In turn, there wasn't a clear value that came out of it, she said.
In contrast, Altman said when she was navigating her own startup Doxly through the incubator arena, she had a great experience leveraging the business expertise of venture studio High Alpha and the industry insights of Dentons' Nextlaw Labs.
"There are a lot of incubators and they can all help you, but some of them aren't where you want them to be," Altman said. "But I was fortunate."
She added that "when you are looking for investors, you want to look at people who can help you in different ways. In High Alpha, we got a lot of expertise in building a company," Altman said. Dentons, meanwhile, provided subject matter expertise about law firms, including how to sell to law firms and lawyer feedback.
Altman's sentiments were shared by other legal tech startups Legaltech News contacted for this article. All noted that while the incubators take them away from directly selling or developing their product or service, the business advice and client connections gained from the program makes it worthwhile.
"When I got in, it was the right thing for my company, it was 100% worth it," said Rachel Shapiro. The founder and president of Medilenz, Shapiro's company participated in LexisNexis's accelerator in 2017. "The time I didn't spend cold calling, marketing [in the incubator] got me back a thousand times more. It was invaluable."
Shapiro noted such accelerators and incubators are competitive and selective, but ultimately the company's success doesn't hinge on participation.
"There are companies that fail anyway so it's hard to say they shouldn't have failed because of the incubator. … It's not like you just sign up. You have to apply, be vetted and state your reason for wanting to be in it, and they reach out to a lot of companies," she explained.
But David Holme, the CEO and co-founder of alternative legal service provider Exigent who recently started an evergreen fund for legal tech, said startups won't grow substantially with these Big Four and Big Law incubators.
"The law firms have no investment experience at all. They definitely haven't demonstrated being more efficient, there's no real drive for efficiencies, technology is one of those things you want to put on brochures and banners," Holmes said. He added that the Big Four "are less legacy than law firms. They are probably a step up from firms, but they too want to use [the startups]. They aren't investors."
Investments in startups are a small drop in the bucket for the Big Four, Holme explained. "For the venture capitalists, their very livelihood would depend on the return. For Deloitte: Our biscuit bill is half a million. We will put it into legal tech and tell them we are a venture fund, and will use their software and we will most certainly profit off of you before you do."
Still, for many legal tech startups, incubators can represent a chance for valuable feedback and face time with potential clients and those in the field.
"There's no quick wins in this world, you have to find the right people to work with to get where you want to be," Altman said. "Be thoughtful about what you want to get out of these organizations."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Most New Eversheds Sutherland US Partners Are in Atlanta
- 2Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 3Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 4Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 5SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250