3 Easy Ways to Improve In-House Legal Workflow
GoDaddy's former GC reveals the three simple ideas were a huge help in her implementation of legal operations efficiencies.
December 19, 2019 at 09:30 AM
4 minute read
We've all heard the tips and read the trends about how in-house lawyers should be managing their legal work: more and more are bringing work in-house; law firms are forced to offer value or hybrid billing; legal ops professionals are critical for making in-house departments more efficient; standard processes should be systematized; routine contracts should be automated; and, so on.
So, what does that mean in real life? Nearly every chief legal officer I know is interested in finding ways to make their department more efficient, and all these wonderful ideas sound great, but how to get them implemented?
Here are some simple steps to help improve in-house legal work flow that even the busiest and most overworked corporate counsel can follow.
1. Do it the same way every time.
Whether it's a routine customer complaint, an HR investigation, or a complex litigation matter, every task has a first time. Be intentional about defining a process for each task the first time you do it, and then do it the same way every time. Record a standard operating procedure (SOP) to define the process, store it in a knowledge base, and make compliance with it a metric against which responsible employees' performance is measured.
This simple discipline gives structure and confidence to employees in the legal department, and those with whom they work in other departments. Review the SOPs on a predefined time schedule (once a year, for example) to update and improve them based on experience. Following SOPs, even for the most complex matters, brings efficiency and stress relief, and eventually, saves the corporation and its in-house legal team time and money.
2. Stop using spreadsheets and email to track your work.
I was speaking at a conference recently. and I took an informal survey of who had the most emails in their inbox at that time. Several people had more than 1,000, a few had more than 10,000, and one guy raised his hand and said he had more than 249,000 emails in his inbox. I made him show me his phone because I didn't believe him at first. Sure enough, there it was, the little red bubble above the email icon: 249,754. Who can manage that many emails? Candidly, I didn't know the little red bubble was big enough to hold a six-digit number!
The truth is, no one can manage that much email. So, in-house lawyers need a better system. Software designed specifically to help corporate counsel manage their communications and task tracking can be a lifesaver. It can also be critical in automating some of your department's tasks, especially the routine ones like NDAs, standard sales contracts, IP tracking, and the like. Think about what types of matters you mange most often and then search for software that caters to your needs. For example, do you need contract management, CRM integration, litigation tracking, IP tracking, or all of the above?
3. Don't reinvent the wheel.
When I was at GoDaddy, I founded a conference that I hosted each year for the top lawyers and compliance/privacy professionals at all the companies in our space. We discussed industry best practices and shared ideas about how to react and respond to various issues that arose in our context. This annual event became a favorite among lawyers in our industry. Not only was it a great way to connect with colleagues with shared experiences, but it also served to cut down on the need for each company to find solutions to issues that had already been solved by someone in a common practice area. To be clear, no competitive market data or sales information was shared.
This was all about helping each other be efficient and not reinventing the wheel when someone else had already been there and done that. So, try to find ways to learn from other professionals in your space, and give back by teaching them a thing or two, as well. It is a huge time saver, and frankly, makes the entire industry better and causes the law to be applied in a more consistent way.
These three simple ideas were a huge help to me in my implementation of legal operations efficiencies, and hopefully, you can find a path that will make them helpful to you, too.
Christine Jones, Esq., is the CEO of contract and project management software solutions company Bigfork Technologies, LLC and former General Counsel of GoDaddy. For more information, contact us at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The FTC’s Noncompete Rule Is Likely Dead
- 2COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
- 3People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
- 5Essential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250