Evisort's Latest $15 Million Fundraising Round Attracts Interest From Microsoft
Contract management platform Evisort recently closed a $15 million Series A funding round that may help bolster the company's efforts in the preexecution space and cement a relationship with Microsoft.
December 19, 2019 at 01:07 PM
4 minute read
The AI-powered contract platform Evisort announced Thursday that it had closed a $15 million Series A funding round. Participants included Vertex Ventures, Amity Ventures, Serra Ventures and—perhaps the most recognizable name of the bunch—Microsoft Corp.'s M12 venture fund.
News of the funding round comes almost a year after Evisort first launched in December 2018, which was followed shortly thereafter by a $4.5 million seed funding round the following February. The platform leverages AI to read a variety of legal documents—contracts, invoices, statements of work, purchase orders—and classifies or tracks key provisions.
So why was now the time for another funding round? The company's target demographic has primarily consisted of corporate legal departments, but that has also served as a gateway to the rest of the enterprise.
"We were sort of waiting for the product to be well-adopted before we went out and expanded the rest of it," said Jerry Ting, the company's CEO and co-founder.
Interest from Microsoft didn't hurt either. The tech giant will gain a seat as an observer on Evisort's board and has also tasked a team member with identifying opportunities for the two companies to work together.
Ting said that many of Evisort's customers already use Microsoft's collaboration platform SharePoint to store their contracts. While Evisort already integrates with that solution, a closer product collaboration between the two companies is not out of the question moving forward.
"We are in the early innings of that kind of a conversation," Ting said.
As for the $15 million in Series A funding—well, Evisort has plans for that too. Per Ting, at least half of the money raised will be poured directly back into the product.
One of the company's key objectives is to continue building out contract workflows. For example, Evisort allows a company to establish a routine by which the platform notifies an attorney when a contract within a certain dollar threshold is set expire and is in need of review.
But AI doesn't train itself. Evisort already employees a large team of attorneys that downloads contracts over the internet and then tags them for data scientists to use as the basis for models. Money from the funding round will be used to expand that roster of engineers as well as launch a new research and development office in Montreal, Quebec.
The extra minds on staff may come in handy as the company looks to push its tech into the pre-signature phase of the contract process. Using AI, for example, the Evisort platform could read any changes that were made to a deal just prior to it being signed and determine whether they require peer review or if the adjustments were mostly immaterial.
"And so we're actually integrating ourselves into the sales process too," Ting said.
It always helps to have an edge, especially in the competitive contract management space. Players like Seal Software and BlackBoiler are also pushing into the preexecution market. And Evisort also isn't the only platform to attract interest from investors, with Luminance receiving $10 million in investments from venture capitalists and law firm Slaughter and May last February.
Ting believes that part of what distinguishes Evisort is its focus on the whole enterprise. But there is a certain educational component that often comes with that.
"When we're out there selling to customers it's almost never competitive. It's not like us versus somebody else. It's us versus a lack of knowledge," Ting said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250