How Can IT Sleep Better at Night? It Starts With Human Connection
As part of the Legalweek 2020 Q&A series, Legaltech News speaks with Day Pitney CIO Kermit Wallace, who reveals the value of unstructured data, why legal tech won't look that different in a decade, and more.
January 02, 2020 at 01:30 PM
4 minute read
|
If your information technology function is in a silo, you're doing 21st century tech wrong. Increasingly, IT personnel—and especially the heads of IT—have increasingly been called upon to make business decisions in law firms. This means that not only must IT professionals learn the value of the data they hold, but the converse as well: the firm at large must learn the potential of what IT can provide. Bridging this gap has necessarily been a crucial topic among law firm leaders in recent years, and as we enter 2020, the conversation shows no signs of slowing down.
As part of the run-up to Legalweek 2020, Legaltech News is chatting with a number of speakers from this year's sessions to know. Today's Q&A is with Kermit Wallace, chief information officer of Day Pitney. His LegalCIO session "Reimagining IT as a Business Intelligence Asset" will take place on Wednesday, February 5, at 3 p.m.
What do you think legal tech looks like in 10 years? What will be the biggest opportunities and challenges?
I may be going against the grain with this answer, but I'm not convinced legal tech will look all that different than it does now. I think there's some interesting things on the horizon—you can't have a legal discussion in the last couple of years without talking about artificial intelligence and machine learning—but the promise of those technologies is still to be fully defined before it can be realized.
What is the biggest misconception you think still persists about legal technology?
The idea that technology people don't understand the business. A person may join one firm in a certain position then change positions or change firms, so there's legal-industry knowledge that typically gets acquired along the way and helps inform their technology decisions. Those of us that have made a career of legal technology have an obligation to do what we can to become well-versed in how a law firm operates and share that knowledge with those less experienced. It helps everyone.
How have data analytics capabilities expanded in even the past 2-3 years that has allowed IT to play a larger role?
Tools that were previously not used in legal have made their way in and are growing to help decision-makers get more information out of the data. IT helping to tie all that data together and bring other systems and processes online will help the decision-makers make better decisions.
What is an example of a piece of data that IT may not realize it has, but can help the organization?
In line with information governance efforts, there is likely data stored in unstructured datasets (file shares or other "transient" repositories) that could be analyzed and ingested into other systems, or destroyed—assuming retention policies are adhered to. This can either help improve the data sources for business intelligence systems and processes or, in the case of destruction, reduce the data footprint and risk associated with holding data unnecessarily.
How should IT begin the process of reaching out to other organization stakeholders with this information?
I always say identifying and connecting with champions from other areas in the firm for technology efforts is the first step. Helping a non-IT person recognize the value in taking the steps to identify the locations, the data, and the appropriate disposition will ultimately go a long way to letting everyone sleep better at night.
What do you hope attendees take away from your Legalweek session?
Attorneys and legal administrators are becoming more aware of the value of the data firms hold. I hope this session helps them realize the future value of good data-hygiene practices and how it can inform more profitable decisions around the work we do.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250