Tech Services Co. Cognizant Has Paid $15M in Legal Fees for Ex-CLO Facing Bribery Charges
Now, the company refuses to pay one of the three law firms that represent the former CLO, arguing that its fees are "abusive" and unreasonable.
January 03, 2020 at 02:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has paid $15 million in legal fees for its former chief legal officer, Steven Schwartz, who is facing federal charges in a foreign bribery case. But Schwartz is now suing the global tech services company because it cut off payment to one of the three law firms that represent him.
Schwartz alleges in his lawsuit that Cognizant stopped paying advancements to the New York-based Bohrer law firm shortly before Thanksgiving, after having previously paid the firm's invoices from June 2018 through September 2019. Cognizant disclosed in a court filing that it advanced $8.36 million in fees to Bohrer before stopping payment in November.
Schwartz and Cognizant ex-president Gordon Coburn face criminal charges for allegedly authorizing a building contractor to pay more than $3.6 million in bribes to a government official in India and attempting to hide the illicit payments.
Cognizant agreed in February to pay a $25 million civil penalty to settle allegations that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The company's ex-chief operating officer, Sridhar Thiruvengadam, later agreed to pay a $50,000 civil penalty and cooperate with investigators as part of a settlement offer.
As the bribery case unfolds, Cognizant continues to pay the other two firms that represent Schwartz: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Gibbons. The New Jersey-based Fortune 200 company also is covering Coburn's legal costs and says it has advanced $20 million in legal fees for the two former executives during the past 18 months.
Schwartz, who sued Cognizant on Dec. 16 in Delaware's Court of Chancery, argues that the company is required under an indemnification agreement to pay advance fees for his defense, while Cognizant contends that Bohrer's bills are "abusive" and unreasonable.
According to Cognizant, Bohrer "has only four attorneys, none of whom had any prior experience in criminal defense; and its lead attorney has a corporate background and no litigation experience at all.
"Despite this, Bohrer PLLC has sought (thus far) payment of more than $10 million in fees—double the amount billed by Paul Weiss. Bohrer PLLC also has billed roughly twice as much as the attorneys at another national firm who represent Mr. Schwartz's co-defendant (another former Cognizant official whose fees Cognizant has advanced in full)," the company states.
"After having advanced Bohrer PLLC's fees of approximately $8.36 million, and then receiving its September 2019 invoice of approximately $1.7 million, Cognizant advised Mr. Schwartz that it would no longer advance fees billed by Bohrer PLLC," Cognizant adds.
In his reply to Cognizant, Schwartz argues that his legal expenses are reasonable and that he "is an expert in identifying and selecting consulting services needed for a crisis and an expert at managing outside spend."
He adds, "Indeed, that was one of the reasons that Cognizant expanded his role elevating him to Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer. If anyone is well-positioned to assemble and monitor his defense team, it is Schwartz, who is intimately familiar with the work that Bohrer PLLC has engaged in."
Schwartz goes on to note that Cognizant has hired at least four law firms, including Goodwin Procter, DLA Piper, Latham & Watkins, and Ross Aronstam & Moritz, and has spent more than $100 million on its defense.
A spokesman for Schwartz and his legal counsel, Steven Goldberg of Sard Verbinnen & Co., said in a statement that "Cognizant's latest attempt to deny Mr. Schwartz his contractual right to advancement relies on a blatant mischaracterization of Bohrer PLLC and the role the firm plays in Mr. Schwartz's defense.
"As an experienced attorney and former chief legal officer, Mr. Schwartz is uniquely positioned to select the team he believes is best qualified to defend himself against the government's case, which never should have been brought," he added. "Bohrer, along with other members of Mr. Schwartz's legal team, deploys creative legal approaches that Mr. Schwartz believes are critical to his defense."
Meanwhile, Cognizant spokesman Rick Lacroix stated that the company "has advanced legal fees to Mr. Schwartz for more than two years and has had no billing disputes with two of his law firms. As this billing dispute with Bohrer PLLC has moved into court, we look forward to vigorously defending ourselves in court."
Read More:
Former Cognizant Exec Settles Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Bribery Case With SEC
In-House Counsel in Construction Industry May See Uptick in Anti-Corruption Enforcement
Cognizant Execs Allegedly Discussed Bribery Scheme During Video Conference Calls
Tech Services Company Cognizant to Pay $25M Over Bribery Allegations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250