China Mirrors International Counterparts With New App Privacy Requirements
China's new app privacy guidelines echoes rights found in the EU's GDPR and California's CCPA.
January 06, 2020 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
Before 2019 came to a close, the Chinese government added another requirement to tech's growing compliance obligations. On Dec. 31, the country issued new guidelines requiring app makers to obtain users' permission and clearly notify app users before collecting their data.
The new standard provides public notice to internet users and app operators of what the Chinese government considers a compliance violation, and it clarifies implementation of China's Cybersecurity Law (CSL), according to a translation of the new requirements from China Law Translate.
The CSL went into effect in 2017 and requires broadly defined "network operators" and other entities to adhere to specific data storage, cybersecurity and data transfer standards. While the law's jurisdiction only applies to companies based in a Chinese territory, lawyers have said the CSL still lacks clarity over its scope. The newest app guidelines, which are also limited to companies based in Chinese territory, should provide some insight for China-based companies leveraging or developing apps that collect local citizens' personal information.
The guideline orders app operators to clearly specify what private information will be collected about an app user. App operators must also inform users how and why it will collect or use the information, especially when collecting ID numbers, bank account numbers, location tracking and other sensitive information.
For app developers or companies leveraging apps, China's requirements are new but not unique, said solo practitioner Zachary Strebeck, who largely represents video game developers.
"I think if you have a global perspective for your game or app, I think it will have an impact," he said. "But I think if you're complying with other laws, you will be 90% there."
He noted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) both include protection and disclosure requirements, which China's new app standards also require. "As long as you are disclosing [what and how information is being collected], that's generally what they want."
Although China's latest guideline doesn't regulate all electronic data, unlike the GDPR and CCPA, it echoes a growing call by regulators to force corporations to enact and follow a privacy policy and provide transparency to users.
Plus, a focus on smartphone apps could be useful. According to the South China Morning Post, more than 80% of China's internet users experienced data breaches in 2018, while more than one-third of apps in China are prone to data safety risk.
To be sure, a data privacy law from Chinese regulators is on the horizon. State-run chinadaily.com noted this latest guideline is an effort to assist law enforcement in detecting and combating privacy-related violations as lawmakers draft the country's first personal information protection law.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250