Legility Acquires Inventus to Bring E-Discovery Skills to Compliance
Inventus has become the third e-discovery company acquired by Legility in three years, and Legility plans to migrate Inventus's products under its own brand in the near future.
January 07, 2020 at 09:01 AM
3 minute read
Today, legal operations service provider Legility acquired e-discovery solution provider Inventus. The two companies said the acquisition is an effort to expand e-discovery into regulatory compliance, and other areas clients can benefit.
Financial details of the merger weren't disclosed, but the deal adds international offices to Legility's footprint, as well as Inventus's multiple technology offerings. These include its fixed-price e-discovery platform Zenith that was released in September and a suite of other discovery solutions.
To be sure Legility, is no stranger to acquiring e-discovery providers. Indeed, the company formerly known as Counsel on Call acquired e-discovery provider iControlESI in August 2019 and DSicovery in September 2017. Currently, Legility offerings include e-discovery tool Legility Envize, data management and data collection tech and forensic technicians and lawyers to assist clients' long- and short-term legal needs.
The Inventus acquisition deal was sparked after a summer 2019 meeting between Inventus CEO Paul Mankoo and Legility CEO Barry Dark to discuss the trajectory of the legal tech market, and of their individual companies. Dark noted they both had heard a similar demand from customers: Corporate and law firm clients want to bring the efficiency and accuracy of e-discovery to compliance and non-litigation legal functions.
"One of the things we are seeing and continuing to see is that clients are looking for trusted relationships with companies that have the pedigrees and experience and know-how on how to implement advancing technology and are of a size and scale and credibility to keep clients' data safe," Mankoo said. "They are increasingly looking for those types of suppliers to work in partnership with."
Mankoo and Dark said Legility didn't acquire Inventus to solely upgrade its e-discovery abilities. Instead, the acquisition was a bid to pair Legility's fleet of attorneys and tech talent to Inventus's data analysis capabilities.
"[This is] not just changing e-discovery, but this is a law company of a very decent global size," Mankoo said of the newly merged company.
Dark noted this new acquisition allows Legility to assist clients by working on the client's legal team, taking outsourcing projects or helping them stay compliant with regulations, such as the newly implemented California Consumer Privacy Act. "The thing about regulations is there is always a new one, so clients have an ongoing need for assistance," Dark noted.
While Dark and Mankoo said Inventus and Legility software will be enhanced by the newly merged companies' access to the other's tech, clients won't see an immediate name change. Noting Legility's own name change in 2018, Dark said Inventus would gradually migrate and rebrand as a Legility product.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250