FISA Court Picks Ex-DOJ Privacy Expert to Review FBI Surveillance Reforms
David Kris is a Justice Department veteran who served under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations and is now a founding partner at the Seattle-based firm Culpepper Partners.
January 13, 2020 at 01:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A secretive federal court in Washington on Friday appointed David Kris, a former Obama-era national security leader at the Justice Department, to review changes the FBI has proposed to its surveillance application process in the aftermath of an inspector general report that exposed misconduct in the bureau's handling of applications related to the monitoring of a Trump campaign adviser.
Kris, a Justice Department veteran who served under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, was selected from among five amicus counsel who are occasionally called on to advance privacy and other interests as a potential check against the government in proceedings at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Now a founding partner at the Seattle-based firm Culpepper Partners, Kris in 2006 publicly criticized the George W. Bush administration's legal justifications for warrantless domestic wiretapping. At the time, Kris was an in-house lawyer at Time Warner Inc.
Kris' latest assignment on the FISA court came as the Justice Department submitted a brief and declaration from FBI Director Christopher Wray that detailed planned overhauls—including additional oversight, new training and "enhanced communication"—to ensure the accuracy and fairness of future surveillance applications.
In a report last month, the Justice Department's inspector general documented numerous examples of misconduct in the FBI's preparation of applications to wiretap the former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page. The inspector general, Michael Horowitz, found the FBI withheld exculpatory information about Page and made misleading statements about his past relationship with a U.S. government agency, detailing 17 omissions and significant errors in surveillance applications.
In the immediate aftermath of the report, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia, then the presiding judge of the surveillance court, rebuked the FBI's conduct as "antithetical to the heightened duty of candor" required in the surveillance application. Collyer ordered the Justice Department to provide the court, by Friday, an outline about what steps have been taken, and will be taken, to ensure filings with the surveillance court are complete and accurate.
In January, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia succeeded Collyer, who stepped down as the surveillance court's presiding judge nine weeks earlier than expected for health reasons. Boasberg's appointment of Kris marked one of his first moves as the surveillance court's presiding judge.
In the submission Friday, Wray outlined reforms designed to bring added accountability to the surveillance application process, and more broadly to how federal agents conduct national security investigations.
"The FBI has the utmost respect for this court, and deeply regrets the errors and omissions identified by the [Justice Department inspector general]," Wray wrote. The inspector's report, he said, described conduct "that is unacceptable and unrepresentative of the FBI as an institution.
"FISA is an indispensable tool in national security investigations, and in recognition of our duty of candor to the court and our responsibilities to the American people, the FBI is committed to working with the court and DOJ to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA process," he wrote.
Among other steps, Wray said the bureau would begin teaching a "case study" based on the Justice Department inspector general's findings and develop new training to ensure the surveillance court is "apprised of all information in the FBI's holdings at the time of an application that would be relevant to a determination of probable cause."
"Critically, the FBI must also balance the implementation of these actions with its ongoing responsibility to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States, during a time of ever-present threats to our national security," Wray said. "The leadership of the FBI has devoted—and will continue to devote—a substantial amount of time, thought and effort to striking this balance, while paying scrupulous attention to its duty of candor to the court and maintaining the trust of the American people."
Read the Justice Department's Jan. 10 filing in the FISA court below:
||
Read more:
At Surveillance Court, Changing of the Guard as DOJ Faces Renewed Scrutiny
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMarriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Bitnomial Exchange Preemptively Sues SEC Over Alleged Enforcement Conflict With CFTC
4 minute read'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Irell & Manella have stepped in to defend Foresight Diagnostics in a pending trade secrets lawsuit. The action, which is sealed, was filed Aug. 29 in California Northern District Court by Richards, Layton & Finger and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eumi K. Lee, is 5:24-cv-06117, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al v. Foresight Diagnostics Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
David A. Robinson, John F. Wood and Brendan H. Connors from Holland & Knight and attorneys from Proskauer Rose have entered appearances for Scientific Drilling International, S. Westley Shedd, Pamela Pierce and other defendants, respectively, in a pending shareholder lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 29 in California Central District Court by Umhofer, Mitchell & King on behalf of Matthew D. Van Steenwyk and Gretchen M. Van Steenwyk-Marsh. The suit accuses the controlling shareholder of Scientific Drilling of self-dealing. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, is 2:24-cv-07401, Matthew D. Van Steenwyk et al v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al.
Who Got The Work
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete partners Laura A. Balson and Ashley L. Orler have entered appearances for Avfuel Corporation in a pending data breach class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Kopelowitz Ostrow PA, centers on a 2024 cyberattack that allegedly exposed the personally identifying and private data of 'potentially billions of individuals.' The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, is 2:24-cv-12274, Clark III v. Avfuel Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Stephanie Lamerce of Duane Morris has entered an appearance for MillerKnoll, the Michigan-based furniture company formerly known as Herman Miller, in a pending website accessibility class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Stein Saks, contends that the defendant's website is inaccessible to screen readers and denies full access to blind and visually-impaired individuals. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak, is 1:24-cv-06106, Hernandez v. Millerknoll, Inc.
Who Got The Work
General Motors has turned to attorney Nancy D. Green of Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey to defend a pending breach-of-warranty lawsuit. The case, for claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, was filed Aug. 30 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by the Lemon Law Group Partners on behalf of the purchaser of a new 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 vehicle. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl, is 5:24-cv-04595, Fey v General Motors LLC.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250