How Legal Tech Can Support the Workforce of the Future
Keeping employees happy is crucial in any industry, but it's especially important in demanding ones like law, where burnout is extremely common.
January 14, 2020 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
In 2016, less than one-quarter of lawyers and only 2% of law firm partners were millennials. Fast forward a decade and that balance will flip, with 75% of the workplace falling into that category. On the one hand, such data points merely illustrate the circle of life. On the other, and with regard to corporate legal departments in particular, they foreshadow demands for cultural change.
While sweeping generalizations aren't always useful, the 2019 MLA Millennial Report clearly highlighted the fact that many up-and-coming lawyers are dissatisfied with the status quo. Over half of survey respondents said they believe the legal industry is fundamentally broken, while 44% expressed the current generation of leadership "has outstayed their effectiveness."
Corporate legal departments need to anticipate, listen to, and respond to millennials as they demand a different work environment in years to come. Keeping employees happy is crucial in any industry, but it's especially important in demanding ones like law, where burnout is extremely common.
More specifically, corporate legal departments can support the workforce of the future by empowering their employees and prioritizing work-life balance—both of which are underpinned by improvements in legal technology. Here's how.
1. Empower employees.
Millennials by and large want more control over their lives. They want to play an active role in creating and improving processes within the corporate legal department, as opposed to feeling like a pawn in a broken system. Implementing legal tech that facilitates flexibility and efficiency are great ways to empower employees. Meanwhile, bringing lawyers into the implementation process takes empowerment to the next level.
Legal tech that supports the workplace of the future will have a relative advantage over current processes, can be implemented with little to no disruption to routine tasks, and can be tried without significant risk if the implementation fails. These may seem like considerations for IT, but in reality they have a huge impact on culture—particularly for the next generation.
2. Prioritize work-life balance.
Speaking of control, millennial lawyers want to be compensated for outcomes—not just for hours worked. Yet billable hours remain the standard for countless corporate legal departments and account for 70 to 80 percent of all law firm revenue.
For millennials, timesheets represent tremendous stressors. The MLA Report found that this generation ranks well-being as their top priority; 75% of respondents said they would give up compensation if it meant fewer billable hours and a more flexible schedule.
Indeed, a survey of Australian lawyers, published in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law in 2013, found that the lawyers who billed the highest number of hours had the worst psychological issues. Additionally, focusing on outcomes as opposed to hours further incentivizes employees to improve processes with an eye towards efficiency, offering even more empowerment.
3. Offer consumer-grade technology.
Countless advances in legal technology—from e-billing and automation to tools offering streamlined data-driven decision-making—can help improve efficiency and empowerment dramatically. In the workplace of the future, the increased use of data, analytics and legal project management will be non-negotiable.
But it's important to realize that tech can also add friction if it's not well-made. Millennials, especially, expect their tech and processes to be consumer-grade. They're digital natives and are accustomed to ease-of-use. Their more mature colleagues may be just as digitally savvy, but they also possess a patience for technology that is still clunky. They remember what it was like before the tech was introduced and therefore see even cumbersome tech as better than nothing. With millennials, on the other hand, there is little tolerance or room for error.
Of course, technology will continue to evolve as the workplace does. Thus, creating an atmosphere that is open to change and receptive to new technology is arguably the foundation for corporate legal departments of the future. Millennials have different expectations for work than their predecessors and, as they become a majority of lawyers, will not hesitate to demand change.
Corporate legal departments cannot resist this evolution. They should already be taking the pulse of current millennial employees with an eye towards the future and should be considering what technology can help promote the empowerment and work-life balance millennials are already beginning to demand.
Nathan Cemenska, JD/MBA, is the Director of Legal Operations and Industry Insights at Wolters Kluwer's ELM Solutions. He previously worked in management consultancy helping GC's improve law department performance and has prior experience as a legal operations business analyst. In past lives, Nathan owned and operated a small law firm and wrote two books about election law. He holds degrees from Northwestern University, Ohio State University and Cleveland State University.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 2People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 4Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 5Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250