How Legal Tech Can Support the Workforce of the Future
Keeping employees happy is crucial in any industry, but it's especially important in demanding ones like law, where burnout is extremely common.
January 14, 2020 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
In 2016, less than one-quarter of lawyers and only 2% of law firm partners were millennials. Fast forward a decade and that balance will flip, with 75% of the workplace falling into that category. On the one hand, such data points merely illustrate the circle of life. On the other, and with regard to corporate legal departments in particular, they foreshadow demands for cultural change.
While sweeping generalizations aren't always useful, the 2019 MLA Millennial Report clearly highlighted the fact that many up-and-coming lawyers are dissatisfied with the status quo. Over half of survey respondents said they believe the legal industry is fundamentally broken, while 44% expressed the current generation of leadership "has outstayed their effectiveness."
Corporate legal departments need to anticipate, listen to, and respond to millennials as they demand a different work environment in years to come. Keeping employees happy is crucial in any industry, but it's especially important in demanding ones like law, where burnout is extremely common.
More specifically, corporate legal departments can support the workforce of the future by empowering their employees and prioritizing work-life balance—both of which are underpinned by improvements in legal technology. Here's how.
1. Empower employees.
Millennials by and large want more control over their lives. They want to play an active role in creating and improving processes within the corporate legal department, as opposed to feeling like a pawn in a broken system. Implementing legal tech that facilitates flexibility and efficiency are great ways to empower employees. Meanwhile, bringing lawyers into the implementation process takes empowerment to the next level.
Legal tech that supports the workplace of the future will have a relative advantage over current processes, can be implemented with little to no disruption to routine tasks, and can be tried without significant risk if the implementation fails. These may seem like considerations for IT, but in reality they have a huge impact on culture—particularly for the next generation.
2. Prioritize work-life balance.
Speaking of control, millennial lawyers want to be compensated for outcomes—not just for hours worked. Yet billable hours remain the standard for countless corporate legal departments and account for 70 to 80 percent of all law firm revenue.
For millennials, timesheets represent tremendous stressors. The MLA Report found that this generation ranks well-being as their top priority; 75% of respondents said they would give up compensation if it meant fewer billable hours and a more flexible schedule.
Indeed, a survey of Australian lawyers, published in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law in 2013, found that the lawyers who billed the highest number of hours had the worst psychological issues. Additionally, focusing on outcomes as opposed to hours further incentivizes employees to improve processes with an eye towards efficiency, offering even more empowerment.
3. Offer consumer-grade technology.
Countless advances in legal technology—from e-billing and automation to tools offering streamlined data-driven decision-making—can help improve efficiency and empowerment dramatically. In the workplace of the future, the increased use of data, analytics and legal project management will be non-negotiable.
But it's important to realize that tech can also add friction if it's not well-made. Millennials, especially, expect their tech and processes to be consumer-grade. They're digital natives and are accustomed to ease-of-use. Their more mature colleagues may be just as digitally savvy, but they also possess a patience for technology that is still clunky. They remember what it was like before the tech was introduced and therefore see even cumbersome tech as better than nothing. With millennials, on the other hand, there is little tolerance or room for error.
Of course, technology will continue to evolve as the workplace does. Thus, creating an atmosphere that is open to change and receptive to new technology is arguably the foundation for corporate legal departments of the future. Millennials have different expectations for work than their predecessors and, as they become a majority of lawyers, will not hesitate to demand change.
Corporate legal departments cannot resist this evolution. They should already be taking the pulse of current millennial employees with an eye towards the future and should be considering what technology can help promote the empowerment and work-life balance millennials are already beginning to demand.
Nathan Cemenska, JD/MBA, is the Director of Legal Operations and Industry Insights at Wolters Kluwer's ELM Solutions. He previously worked in management consultancy helping GC's improve law department performance and has prior experience as a legal operations business analyst. In past lives, Nathan owned and operated a small law firm and wrote two books about election law. He holds degrees from Northwestern University, Ohio State University and Cleveland State University.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1I’m A Lawyer, What Can I Sell?
- 2Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Don’t Be an Opportunity Killer,' Says Thomas Haskins of Barnes & Thornburg
- 4People in the News—Feb. 7, 2025—Gawthrop Greenwood, Lamb McErlane
- 5NY No-Fault Insurance Adopts Worker’s Compensation Fee Schedule
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250