Why the .Law Domain May Become a Necessity for Firms
The road toward wide adoption of the .law domain by law firms may be long, but it gained a significant user when Wiley recently rebranded.
January 21, 2020 at 10:30 AM
4 minute read
Recently, Am Law 200 law firm Wiley not only shortened its name, but also swapped its .com web domain for .law.
While Wiley's domain move is uncommon in the legal industry, observers say it will likely become a necessity as law firms attempt to assure clients' potential cybersecurity concerns and rebrand themselves.
The overall rebranding was a strategy to refocus on the wider array of practices the firm offers while still maintaining the name recognition earned from previous successes, Wiley said. Likewise, the switch to .law was also strategic to further its branding as a legal authority and give prospective clients greater assurance, the firm said.
Noting the bar license verification required to register a .law domain, Wiley partner David Weslow said potential clients have a greater confidence that the law firm website they clicked on is owned by an actual law firm.
"The consumer knows the site they're reaching is legitimate and not a scam site," Weslow said, noting reports of consumers being duped by fraudulent sites.
Absent the verification, the steps to registering a .law domain are minimal, noted Christa Taylor, chief marketing officer of Minds + Machines, a top-level domain provider that owns the .law registry.
Taylor noted that Minds + Machines is a wholesaler that sells .law and other top-level domains to registrars and resellers. The variety of registrars causes the price of .law domain to vary, she added. However, Wiley confirmed it paid under $200 to acquire its new .law domain.
To be sure, the .law domain hasn't caught on with law firms. Robert Algeri of law firm website design company Great Jakes Marketing said one of the factors holding back .law is muscle memory,
"If you already have a good .com domain, the safest course of action is to stick with it," he said. "People will reflexively go to .com."
Still, Algeri said the .law domain is "short and sweet" and will eventually become more common.
".Law isn't a trend yet but it will become a trend," Algeri said. "The reason is due to another trend that is affecting law firms. Law firms are shortening their name just as Wiley Rein has shortened its name to Wiley. As the name shortening trend continues, they won't be able to find a corresponding .com." For Wiley's part, the firm said it decided to switch its domain to .law early during rebranding discussions.
Still, as a host of law firms continue to trim their names to match the sleek and modern branding of their corporate clients, security consultants warn previously owned domains can't be forgotten.
"The risks are minimal as long as the company owns the previous domain names, and keeps extending them before the domain registration expires," wrote Iron Bastion information security consultant and researcher Gabor Szathmari in an email. "In case the domain name registration is not extended for any reason in the distant future, an attacker can simply reregister the domain name to assume control."
Someone could choose to restore the email service or set up a fake website on the former domain name to deceive former clients or employees, he said. To prevent potential phishing schemes, Szathmari suggested firms submit a change of web address notification to search engines to migrate results from the old site to the new site.
He also recommended updating the firm's web servers, reconfiguring email systems and a host of other tasks when switching domains.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250