Relativity Announces Month-to-Month Pay Model for Cloud-Based RelativityOne
The "pay-as-you-go" move is aimed at bringing the cloud-based e-discovery platform's subscription options in line with other SaaS and cloud services.
January 30, 2020 at 10:01 AM
2 minute read
Relativity is offering up a new payment plan for its RelativityOne cloud-based e-discovery service, aimed at making the platform more in line with common SaaS and cloud services options.
The new pricing system will be what Relativity calls a "pay-as-you-go" model: paying for the software on a month-by-month basis rather than longer contracts such as a one or three-year subscription. The pay-as-you-go pricing will be based on the amount of data in the system and the users that are enabled to access RelativityOne. The prices for that data will change based on where the data is stored, said Nick Robertson, chief operating officer at Relativity. Similar to other RelativityOne pricing options, data stored in early case assessment functions or cold storage will be cheaper than active review.
The new payment model will go live on February 17. Changes to the company's flex commit model, which provides discounts of up to 25% from pay-as-you-go pricing, will occur on the same day.
This is the second straight year that Relativity has announced major changes to RelativityOne pricing at the beginning of the year. Last year, the company announced changes to how data is charged based on where it is stored, as well as offering a consumption-based pricing model where users and data would be reevaluated each month within those one or three-year subscriptions.
For this pricing change, said Robertson, increased flexibility similar to what customers receive with other enterprise SaaS platforms was the goal. "We are excited to announce our new pay-as-you-go pricing model in response to a lot of feedback we've gotten from our customers," he added in a press release. "It aligns with SaaS and cloud models frequently found outside of our industry and will make it easier for all of our customers to take advantage of RelativityOne."
2020 will continue to see change for Relativity. The company announced a full redesign of its user interface at October's Relativity Fest, and the "Aero" UI will be present at this year's Legalweek conference before a full release in the second half of the year. The announced RelativityOne Government service will also be rolling out later this year, following the completion of FedRAMP's In Process designation on January 6.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
