New Financial Cybersecurity Rules Signal SEC's Deepening Cyber Focus
A new cybersecurity regulation for the financial industry is likely not taking many entities by surprise, as lawyers say this is one more sign to expect a growing list of corporate cyber requirements.
January 31, 2020 at 12:36 PM
4 minute read
U.S. financial regulators are wiping out ambiguities over cybersecurity standards and best practices, and lawyers say it's not going to stop anytime soon.
Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) gave the go-ahead for the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) to enact a cybersecurity requirement for its 3,000 members. The NSCC provides clearing, settlement risk management, central counter-party services and a guarantee of completion for most broker-to-broker trades involving equities, corporate and municipal debt, exchange-traded funds and unit investment trusts.
Despite the NSCC's 3,000 members, which include large banks and other financial institutions, the SEC noted in its Dec. 9 approval that the proposed rule change received no comment during the public comment period. Perhaps the new requirement didn't catch many off guard.
"I think what stuck out about it was no one commented about it," said Debevoise & Plimpton cybersecurity and litigation partner Luke Dembosky. "That may be it was deemed reasonable by industry or deemed inevitable by industry, but whether through acquiescence or regulatory fatigue no one commented, so this simply went through. It should not surprise anyone."
The new requirements require NSCC members, applicants and trade data reporting organizations that connect to NSCC's network to align their cybersecurity frameworks to industry standards like the the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF), the International Organization for Standardization standard 27001/27002 (ISO 27001), and others.
Entities are required to submit forms listing specific cybersecurity programs and frameworks used by the company and update its risks processes as its risk, tech, business or regulatory environment changes. Current or aspiring NSCC members' senior executives must all sign the form as well.
Lawyers said most of the NSCC member entities were likely under the scope of regulations that demand similar, if not more stringent, regulations.
"All that the rule is intended to do is require that firms that participate in NSCC would have to provide a cybersecurity certification," said Goodwin Procter partner Bill Stern, whose practice includes fintech. "It doesn't, on its own, impose proscriptive or specific cybersecurity requirements in the way the New York's Cybersecurity Regulation did."
Still, lawyers noted this requirement is the latest in an ongoing effort by U.S. regulators to steer companies toward compliance with new legal mandates and cyber best practices.
Earlier this week, the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations released its cybersecurity best practices to help financial institutions better manage cyber risk. The suggestions echo the recently passed NSCC requirement, noted Michael Best & Friedrich privacy and cybersecurity chair and partner Adrienne Ehrhardt.
"One of the things they talked about was governance and risks management, which is having that buy-in from the top," she said. Likewise, the new regulation's accountability requirement by a top executive mirrors New York's Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation, which went into effect in 2017, Ehrhardt noted.
The SEC's latest move also mimics the broader push across industries to enact and proactively monitor cybersecurity plans, she added.
"I think in general the whole idea of better practices you are starting to see reflected even in the California law [the California Consumer Privacy Act]. Having a reasonable security plan is being reflected, having accountability and written procedures in place is a trend seen across not just financial institutions but other industries as well."
But White and Williams chief privacy officer Richard Borden noted observers shouldn't disregard the significance of the NSCC and its designation as a "systemically important financial market utility" under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The new requirement ensures NSCC, its members and third-parties understand their cyber risks.
"Once again there's some financial institutions that are members that are already heavily regulated and have most of this in place, and there are others that don't and this will be somewhat newer. Every time there is regulation, it increases the burdens."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250