Reed Smith Launches E-Discovery App, Seeking Pocket-Sized Efficiency
Reed Smith launched a new e-discovery-focused app with the aim of creating a less cumbersome, and fast-updating repository of knowledge, documents and tips for attorneys and clients on the go.
February 03, 2020 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Just because a resource exists doesn't necessarily mean that people know where to find it. It's a sentiment that may hold especially true to e-discovery and all of its many rules, forms and procedures. To that end, Reed Smith's records and e-discovery (RED) practice group released a new app Monday geared toward condensing many of those items into something that can fit on a smartphone.
The E-Discovery App was developed with the help of the firm's tech subsidiary GravityStack and is available to download free of charge at the Apple App Store and Google Play. On the app, users will find resources such as a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) cross-border checklist, document review management insights and a solution provider directory.
But while organizations like EDRM and the Sedona Conference may provide a similar knowledge base, deploying an app may offer some very practical advantages to law firms looking to cut costs and bolster efficiency. For example, Reed Smith has typically rendered its e-discovery guidance in print and packaged it into a manual for the firm's litigators. But David Cohen, a partner at Reed Smith and chair of RED, said that the annual copying costs totaled thousands of dollars.
"Now we can update it in real time on the app and everybody has an immediate reference," Cohen said.
However, even app updates require a time commitment given just how quickly the e-discovery space tends to evolve. Cohen noted that he has a weekly meeting scheduled with the firm's app team to discuss any additions or improvements that may need to be made. He stressed that maintaining an app such as Reed Smith's is far from a one-and-done endeavor.
"And that might be one of the things in the past that has discouraged people from creating this kind of an app. … To keep it relevant, you're going to have to constantly update it," Cohen said.
To be sure, Reed Smith is not the only firm to venture into the app game. Latham & Watkins released a Foreign Direct Investment Regimes app last October, with Slaughter and May rolling out its mental health and well-being app Unmind the same month.
Mary Mack, CEO and chief legal technologist at EDRM, believes that more law firms will continue to produce similar products, especially with the advent of legal-focused app stores like Reynen Court. But with the well-established presence of e-discovery resources such as EDRM or Sedona, is a law firm-produced app that touches on the same subject matter really necessary? Mack, who received an early look at Reed Smith's e-discovery app, thinks so. She cited the potential value gain for attorneys that are not well-versed in e-discovery who could benefit from the presence of an easy-to-reference cheat sheet that fits in their phone.
"Nobody thinks anything of people looking on their phone during a meeting. They tend to sometimes look at you a little askance if you're typing on your computer," Mack said.
While the user value may be rooted squarely in portable knowledge, Reed Smith and its attorneys may be getting their cut in time saved. Cohen said that while he doesn't like charging clients for simple e-discovery-related questions or tasks, the alternative is to potentially spend a chunk of an otherwise billable hour looking for the right form.
"I can't tell you how many times somebody calls me up and says, 'Hey, do you have a sample legal hold notice that I can adapt to my case?'" Cohen said.
The e-discovery app stands to potentially streamline that process with a portfolio of readily available forms that users can access without having to dial their attorney. But aside from the efficiency boost, Cohen indicated that Reed Smith isn't expecting to see any other kind of monetary return on the project, even if there is an audience.
"I think that we're going to see a lot of interest in this app because a lot of people are involved in the e-discovery industry and could use access to these types of resources," Cohen said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250