LTN's Key Takeaways from Legalweek New York 2020: Day 1
After a long first day of Legalweek, LTN's reporters and editors break down what they saw, ranging from a more discerning buying public to contracts being the buzz and more.
February 04, 2020 at 09:30 PM
4 minute read
Rhys Dipshan: On the first day of the Legalweek 2020, the message was clear: Attorneys are becoming more discerning tech consumers. They're moving beyond the hype, and considering the reality of how novel technology will—and won't—live up to its potential. Take for example, blockchain-powered smart contracts, which many have said would be completely self-executing without the need for legal intermediaries.
But today, attorneys were convinced such a reality could not come to pass: Potential technical issues could plague such contracts, and legal complexities would render them a poor choice of arbitration or dispute.
The same dose of reality has also tampered down on the expectations for AI or algorithmic-based technology. Sure, they can provide unprecedented levels of insight into risk and pricing. But the fact one cannot understand how such tools work, or properly control how they are deployed, limit their usefulness.
If Legalweek has shown anything, it's that technology for technology's sake doesn't work. Every novel innovation has to find its place within pre-existing legal, regulatory, and business frameworks. If they don't, there's little hope for their survival.
Victoria Hudgins: Walking the vendor floor of Legalweek is always somewhat overwhelming. There are a bunch of vendors with varying logos, sales people pitching their products and various impromptu huddled meetings you have to navigate around while walking the room.
But vendors and legal tech observers say they've noticed a difference in the exhibits. Noticeably, the dominant vendor presence at Legalweek has shifted from e-discovery to contract tools, says Onit CEO Eric Elfman.
Likewise, during a panel discussion about legal tech investment, Fennemore Craig president and managing partner James Goodnow declared: "Contracts are the new e-discovery." He cited the heavier presence of contract tools at Legalweek and rising investment into contract tools as evidence of these solutions' growing popularity.
To be sure, I did spot large booths from e-discovery heavy hitters such as Relativity, DISCO, KLDiscovery and a host of others. However, last year Legaltech News did report multiple contract solutions secured sizable investments and large entities, such as Wolters Kluwer, acquired contract companies.
E-discovery is the "mature" technology in legal, observers have said. Will contract creation, management and analytics meet that maturity in a notoriously change-averse industry? Time will tell.
Frank Ready: Armed with nothing but a laptop and a few fist fulls of granola I made my way into what history —or at least the calendar on my phone— will surely note as the first day of the Legalweek 2020.
When I pause to try and pick a few specific instances out from the blur that has been the last seven hours, I think about the factoid that there are more than 100 countries with privacy laws in this world (a figure that is no doubt eclipsed by the number of Starbucks).
Keeping with the international theme, a digital transformation panel also made a pretty good case that some kind of global consensus will eventually have to be reached on how AI is leveraged across borders. Necessary? Maybe. Likely? You be the judge.
Zach Warren: This afternoon, I moderated the "Demonstrating Agility in the Face of Constant Change" panel of the LegalCIO conference, I went in there expecting to talk about making business cases, calculating ROI, and getting into the nerdy details of just how firms' tech stacks have exploded. Instead I was faced with a different reality: the importance of soft skills.
Mayer Brown's Sam Whitman talked about how communication is the number one determining factor of how successful a tech implementation is going to be. Microsoft's Dominic Crosby revealed that a lot of the legal department's tech initiatives are incubated in a grassroots style; what's important is that the attorneys are curious. Clark Hill's Joan Holman dove into how a lot of her firm's great tech ideas are the result of looking outside of legal and having simple conversations. And Orrick's Wendy Butler Curtis ran through a design thinking workshop and revealed that what's most important is simply getting attorneys to shut up, give up control and get on board.
In the end, law is a profession based on relationships, and even though many of us often live in a tech bubble, it's ultimately the relationships that determine success or failure. For those (like myself at times) who view tech as "removed" or that some lawyers simply don't get it, it's important to remember that technology is nothing without people to use it. The idea of adoption and change management is here to stay.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 2How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 3Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 4Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 5Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250