New Wolters Kluwer Solution Goes Back In-House With Legal Billing
Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions introduced a new LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer Data Service, which positions some of the company's existing AI tech toward in-house review teams.
February 04, 2020 at 09:30 AM
3 minute read
Organizations may be exploring the benefits of outsourcing some of their legal needs, but that doesn't mean that in-house billing teams still aren't open to receiving a technological assist now and again. To this end, Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions announced Tuesday it has launched a new LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer Data Service that pivots AI and data analytics capabilities toward that very demographic.
The solution is a spinoff of the company's LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer, which launched in 2017 and applies AI, machine learning and a Wolters Kluwer review team toward the problem of invoice management. Per Wolters Kluwer, the amount of legal spend moving through BillAnalyzer's Expert Service has increased by sixfold since 2018, and the Data Service is an attempt to bridge a potential missing link in the chain: Organizations with their own billing review teams on staff who still want to make use of Wolters Kluwer's AI technology.
In other words, just because many companies may be outsourcing their legal billing efforts, it doesn't mean that everyone else is doing the same.
"We do see kind of the mix. We do see folks kind of starting to fill out their teams internally and as they do that we're happy to have that conversation with them of, 'Hey, this is a service that we offer as well," said Jeffrey Solomon, senior director of product management at Wolters Kluwer ELM Solutions.
But what exactly does AI bring to the billing review process? Solomon framed it as an alternative to keyword searches and the pitfalls that can result for an organization attempting to comply with billing guidelines. Terms can occupy the dual extremes of being either too narrow or too broad, and either one can put a damper on efficiency. Backed by a robust database of legal spend performance data, Wolters Kluwer's AI is intended to facilitate a more targeted search.
Still, building the Data Service wasn't as simple as splitting the AI capabilities off of BillAnalyzer Expert Service. In order to make the solution user-friendly for billing personnel who don't necessarily have a deep background in artificial intelligence, the way that certain outputs and results were presented had to be retooled.
"Really where a lot of the work went in was around the customization of things like reading code so we can really present things back to the customer not in an AI tech-sounding way, but in a way that highlights 'this is specifically what [billing] guidelines it's violating and this is why,'" Solomon said.
To be sure, Wolters Kluwer isn't the only company with a foot in legal billing as consumer demand for related technologies continues going strong. Companies such as Thompson Reuters and Orion also carry offerings related to e-billing or financial management. However, while AI may be a powerful tool in that kit, it does create a potential barrier of entry to new providers who don't have the large data set required to power it.
Solomon believes that they will begin to see more direct competitors emerge in the AI billing arena soon.
"AI is a pretty fast-moving technology and we're pretty pleased that we were able to get a three or four-year head start on most of our competitors," Solomon said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250