Reality Check: It's Not About Adopting AI, It's About Solving Problems
A Legalweek panel highlighted how companies that expect to wipe out all inefficiencies or challenges with AI are sadly mistaken.
February 06, 2020 at 12:36 PM
3 minute read
Conversations regarding AI-backed legal tech still need a reality check in terms of expectations and pricing, according to a panel held Wednesday at Legalweek 2020 in New York .
During the "Memo to LegalTech Founders: Powerpoints Don't Create AI—Data Scientists Do!" session, panelist and Littler Mendelson chief data analytics officer Aaron Crews noted that c-suite's lofty ideas regarding AI and vendors' usage of the buzzword leads to unreachable expectations.
"At the vendor level there's a lot of market speak about AI and in the c-suite there's conversations that AI will make the company go faster," he said. But he added that those tasked with implementing such technology and meeting the c-suite's goals are left with the reality that a single AI-powered tool can't solve large, encompassing challenges.
"I think there is a reality around adoption that is coming quickly. You'll see a shift to: Here's a very specific pain point and we have a very specific solution," Crews said.
Evaluating a single challenge and determining a tech solution's downstream ROI and cost will lead to faster tech adoption, Crews argued.
For his part, Liberty Mutual Insurance director of innovation Jeff Marple said utilizing a certain quota of tech tools isn't his legal department's goal. Instead, his legal department is looking to use technology to cut spend and resolve other challenges.
To be sure, Clark Hill CIO Joan Holman said she hasn't heard a specific demand for tech from corporate clients per se. Rather, clients want to minimize spend and improve strategies, which leads to tech usage by the firm, she explained.
As law firms turn to tech tools to help deliver the services clients demand, Blickstein Group principal Brad Blickstein noted that greater efficiency from AI could lead to a dip in the billable hour. Simply, "If your tool does an hour's worth of work for two minutes you can't just bill for two minutes," he said.
Instead, law firms need to figure out how to commercialize their assistance, through subscriptions, price per unit or by other measures, Blickstein explained.
"The real value is for firms to identify tools that solve problems for their clients, implement those tools to help clients and roll out those tools," he said.
TE legal operations business performance senior manager James Michalowicz noted alternative legal service providers are already accustomed to pricing by document, contract, witness preparation, depositions and other services provided. He said it's a pricing model more law firms should become familiar with.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250