It's Time for Law Firms to Think Again About Their Cybersecurity Strategy
One employee falling for a phishing email can compromise a firm's entire database. Will your client information be protected if that were to happen?
February 11, 2020 at 07:00 AM
7 minute read
Picture this: you're a hacker on the hunt for sensitive data to use for nefarious means. Whether it's financial information or confidential disclosures, you're planning a digital heist for the ages. Now the question is, what's your easiest mark?
If you answered a law firm, you'd be right on the money.
For cybercriminals, law firms are a dream target: They offer a treasure trove of the most sensitive information while often implementing poor policies and technologies for cybersecurity and IT. It's no wonder then that legal firms are increasingly under attack by hackers.
Law firms are often involved in intimate transactions for their clients and deal with very sensitive data that goes beyond traditional personally identifiable information (PII), including highly confidential business and financial documents. Despite this, firms often lack thoroughness in their awareness of cybersecurity issues and overlook the various vulnerabilities. It usually takes just a single employee's account to compromise the entire system.
The key to cybersecurity for these firms, beyond technology, is to implement comprehensive policies for employees, especially in areas involving sensitive data. Regular risk assessments will also go a long way in laying the foundation for keeping hackers away.
The Password is the Weakest Link
Usage of passwords continues to be the Achilles heel of cybersecurity. Not only are the cracked password lookup tables growing into billions of data points, access to them has become cheap and easy for any hacker willing to pay a fee for it. This new phenomenon has become possible as hacking groups have realized that it is profitable to "rent out" their assets to others creating a sub-industry on the dark web.
The human element that exacerbates the problem the most that we heavily rely on reusing passwords across online services, work accounts and even social media accounts. The most popular modus operandum hackers use would be get obtain passwords from a less secure online "free" service and use them to access highly sensitive documents such as the ones lawyers and attorneys are privy to.
The Threat is Universal, Consequences Severe
A complacent attitude towards security has serious ramifications—massive damage to the reputation of the firm, possible penalties from government agencies, leaked data media investigations, and even lawsuits from clients.
A recent Law.com investigation found that more than 100 law firms have reported data breaches that compromised highly sensitive and confidential data. This may only be the tip of the iceberg as many breaches can go either undetected or unreported.
One such landmark breach was the 2015 exposure of 11.5 million documents belonging to the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. This explosive leak led to the disclosure of some of the world's wealthiest asset stashes, causing at least 150 inquiries or investigations in 79 countries. Two years later, the law firm shut down due to the economic and reputational damage it suffered.
Although the media eagerly reported on the scandalous data obtained from the leak, there is little information about how the breach actually happened. Over time, security experts have concluded that lack of basic web security practices on the part of Mossack Fonseca and their web administrators—including having out-of-date WordPress and Drupal content management software—made them easy prey to hackers.
Mossak Fonseca isn't the only example of a law firm suffering from a major security breach. According to third-party experts, more than 80% of the 100 largest U.S. firms have been hacked since 2011 and majority of them have increased their IT spends significantly
Among smaller law firms, there is a misplaced sense of security since they think they are too small or remote to be attacked. However, trends have revealed that hackers are indiscriminate; everyone is at risk.
Artificial Intelligence Worsens the Problem
Already, the use of artificial intelligence takes the effectiveness and scale of phishing attacks to a new level. Algorithms can now be used to "harvest" passwords at scale due to the high degree of personalization that makes phishing emails much harder to distinguish from legitimate ones.
In the near future, AI also as the potential to help hackers steal confidential data at scale through algorithmic social engineering. It is not inconceivable that this kind of technology combines with data obtained through social engineering to send a highly personalized believable email to a lawyer convincing them that the email is coming from their client and leading them to reveal confidential client information to the hacker.
How to Protect Your Firm from Cyber Attacks
There are some key steps law firms need to take to ensure they remain prepared for possible breaches.
First, they need to set aside a budget and dedicated personnel for cybersecurity. They need to establish solid data governance and a cybersecurity policy while assigning an executive member to drive this and perpetually keep systems and procedures up-to-date.
Firms must thoroughly protect employee access to systems; this includes contract and remote workers. Multifactor or biometric-based authentication is mandatory as all user entry points must be safely guarded.
Storing all data in an encryption format is crucial. Firms also need to vet all third-party vendors and partners for their data security practices.
Finally, law firms need to create processes for training, compliance monitoring, and active detection and response. They should develop an incident response plan as well as hire third-party experts to assess risks and conduct audits regularly.
There are plenty of resources that outline the recommended security measures. Law firms need to look into adopting all or parts of the guidelines of security standards such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Center for Internet Security (CIS).
A cyber insurance policy can also provide coverage in the event of a breach. Even with all reasonable measures in place, a determined hacker may still find a backdoor into the system. Law firms often have the additional complexity of ensuring client safety in addition to their own cyber protection.
There is No Future Proofing
Cybersecurity is a perpetual game of staying current with the technology that criminals are using in their attempts to obtain sensitive data. As hackers get more sophisticated in their tools and techniques, law firms need to consider using advanced technology—such as AI and prediction models—as well.
Firms need to stay proactive to avoid breaches and make themselves as cyber-resilient as possible. You may think, "No one I work with would ever fall for a hacker's phishing emails," but you'd be surprised. Hackers are constantly optimizing their digital trickery, making it increasingly hard to detect a threat using only human judgment.
Aman Khanna is Co-Founder and VP of Products at ThumbSignIn, a strong authentication provider offering a suite of two-factor and biometric solutions. Khanna is a seasoned software product management professional with more than 20 years of experience in the consumer mobile and internet space, with specific expertise in cybersecurity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250