Reading the Tea Leaves in NHSTA's First Approval of Fully Autonomous Vehicles
While the NHTSA's approval only applied to a fleet of low-speed, small vehicles used solely for delivering goods, it does offer some insights into the regulator's thinking.
February 12, 2020 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Last week the autonomous vehicle industry reached a significant milestone when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration granted robotics company Nuro three exemptions to deploy its fully autonomous car fleet in the U.S.
While the U.S. Department of Transportation's approval marks a significant regulatory shift toward embracing fully autonomous vehicles, Nuro's R2X fleet is low-speed, small and solely for delivering goods. It's still unclear, therefore, how applicable the Nuro approval will be to fully autonomous, high-speed, passenger vehicles.
"The policy concerns and security concerns NHSTA needs to grapple with is very different than what they have to face when say GM is being faced with its exemption," said vice president of ML Strategies Christian Fjeld, a former Democratic Senate staffer that lead the AV START Act through the U.S. Senate.
"The value that traditional autonomous vehicles could glean is how they are not Nuro, and likely the bar they'll have to clear is likely higher," he said.
While Nuro may not apply to all, the auto industry may finally receive guidance on fully autonomous passenger vehicles—eventually. Last year the NHSTA formally announced it was considering General Motors' application for several federal motor vehicle safety standards exemptions for its passenger vehicles.
But for now, the Nuro approval provides some insights into NHTSA's thinking and potential best practices AV automakers should adopt, said Honigman data security and privacy litigation partner and co-leader Steven Wernikoff.
Indeed, when NHTSA granted Nuro's request for exemptions, it included requirements and governmental oversight the regulator admitted are not typically required for exempted vehicles. But given public interest in the "unique and novel design" of the R2X car, the Department of Transportation determined it was warranted.
The conditions for the exemptions include requiring Nuro to provide cybersecurity incident reports and shut down operations of R2X vehicles until a cyber incident that impacts safety is resolved. Additionally, Nuro must send all incident-related information and data about R2X's operations and its automated driving system to NHSTA.
Wernikoff said the requirements are useful for obtaining approval from NHSTA, even if the autonomous vehicle isn't identical to the R2X.
"Even if it doesn't apply specifically to the design of the vehicle they're planning to put out, it's an extremely useful guidance of what the likely requirements would be for the company to release an autonomous vehicle," he said.
Likewise, such reports help regulators collect ongoing data from the AV industry to better understand the industry and develop rulemaking that is grounded in good data, said Jones Day of counsel Dean Griffith.
"One of the benefits of the exemption world is that it helps the agency to get data for down the road as it looks to regulate or put in place a set of standards for autonomous vehicles," said Griffith.
Although the exemption process is lengthy, Nuro applied for exemptions in 2018, lawyers say it's the fastest route to get fully autonomous vehicles on U.S. roads.
"That [federal rulemaking] is going to take a long time and so it seems more likely that the guidance and progress will come from these case-by-case exemptions," Wernikoff said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250