Iridium Technology Merges with DFTech, Seeing Business Intelligence 'Tipping Point'
A merger between legal business intelligence companies Iridium Technology and DFTech will help the former to fill in the gaps around its financial analytics offerings as law firms start to view data analytics as a competitive necessity.
February 19, 2020 at 02:18 PM
3 minute read
Sometimes one head is better than two. Legal business intelligence (BI) companies Iridium Technology and Data Fusion Technologies, Inc. (DFTech) announced today they have merged into a single entity with more than 65 employees and 250 clients.
The combined entity will fly under the Iridium Technology banner, folding DFTech's Intellistat and Steere business analytic tools into the company's existing line of products. Terms of the merger were not disclosed, but Iridium CEO and founder Tom Jones indicated that casual discussions around merging began around two-years ago.
"You get tired of fighting each other, and so why don't we join forces? And there were really a lot of alignments as far as filling in spaces or gaps in our product offerings and just building out our technical team," Jones said.
While Iridium has primarily focused on business intelligence offerings that can be used to measure revenue or track performance, DFT Tech president Jeff Suhr noted that his company will help fill existing gaps with its portfolio of "financial analytics applications" that can be used for tasks like budgeting, financial reporting, paperless pre-billing and alert notification management.
To be sure, there are no shortage of companies looking to establish a beachhead in the legal business and financial intelligence space. Last March, Orion released the fifth incarnation of its practice and financial management software, which also features a paperless pre-billing feature. On the matter planning and pricing front, Wolters Kluwer just dropped a new AI-powered LegalVIEW BillAnalyzer Data Service designed to help legal teams manage billing guidelines.
However, this playing field may be in no imminent danger of becoming overcrowded.
"A lot of times you'll see entrants come into the market and then quickly exit. … A lot of that is barriers to entry—number one [is] the technical domain expertise. But quite honestly it's also making sure that you've got a good roster of clients who are supporting you," Suhr said.
It's never wise to take that last part for granted. A panel held during Legalweek in January examined how law firm IT departments can leverage data analytics to drive insights and change inside their own organizations. But panelists indicated that convincing leadership to get on board can be an uphill battle since most firms are inexperienced at making their data work for them.
However, Jones said that Iridium has seen more law firms invest in business intelligence solutions around profitability over the years.
"I think it's reached a tipping point where firms now think that that if they don't have a BI solution on profitability or analytics, they are now at a disadvantage. So I think the phase where we were educating clients has been checked," Jones said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250