Law Firms Are Adopting a Legal Operations Perspective
As the legal operations movement continues to take hold in corporate client organizations, in-house teams are looking to outside law firms to join them in their efforts.
February 20, 2020 at 01:30 PM
6 minute read
This article appeared in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy, an ALM publication for privacy and security professionals, Chief Information Security Officers, Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Corporate Counsel, Internet and Tech Practitioners, In-House Counsel. Visit the website to learn more.
Legal operations as a discipline within corporate legal departments is receiving more attention, funding and staffing over the last few years. Efforts by groups such as CLOC (Corporate Legal Operations Consortium) are driving change in the legal industry through the creation of structured legal operations framework, and the provision of education on best practices and business benefits.
A 2019 survey of CLOC member companies suggests that legal operations is a thriving movement in corporate legal. The survey found that over the past two years, corporate legal departments continued to focus on controlling costs, established or grew their legal operations teams, and continued to invest in technology.
Law firms are clearly in important player in the legal services value stream; as the legal operations movement continues to take hold in corporate client organizations, in-house teams are looking to outside law firms to join them in their efforts to reduce operating costs, improve staffing, take greater advantage of technology, and improve project management processes.
The success of law firms in this changing environment may well rest on their ability to understand and embrace this new paradigm, by applying legal operations principles in their own practices and in their consultative contributions to corporate clients. By understanding legal operations approach, law firms can gain a better appreciation of client needs, share the client's vision and contribute to client satisfaction, while creating a competitive advantage for the firm.
The foundation of a legal operations framework as defined by CLOC includes 12 competencies representing areas of focus that every legal operations department must manage to have a disciplined, efficient, and effective legal operations function. Law firms embarking on the implementation of legal operations should look first to the following four CLOC foundational areas for opportunities to strengthen client relationships and participate in the new legal operations paradigm.
|Financial Management
Effective corporate legal financial management includes budgets, spending trends, identifying potential cost savings. In a recent Altman Weil survey of legal departments, over 46% of responding in-house legal departments listed improved budget forecasting as one of the top service improvements they wanted to see from law firms. Law firms can contribute to client success by offering flexible fee arrangements, providing accurate cost estimates, invoicing in a detailed and timely manner, and offering e-billing. Analytics tools can examine matter details and billing activity to provide the client with insight on opportunities for cost reduction, and to forecast costs on active projects.
|Vendor Management
Corporate legal operations teams are increasingly creating vendor management programs to insure quality outside counsel support, with a focus on quality, cost effectiveness, responsiveness and results. In particular they want firms to offer digital access to information, advice and documents. Law firms that gain the trust of clients are invited into discussions about workflow, matter management, staffing and responsibilities. With this level of trust and participation, law firms have an opportunity to better understand the client's business goals and expectations. Firms can then leverage that knowledge to propose enhanced project management and workflow tools, and to report performance to corporate legal KPIs in a digital dashboard.
|Cross-Functional Alignment
The in-house legal function has historically been seen as a cost center and a separate silo, not well connected to the core business. A foundational effort is underway in legal operations, aiming to align legal with other key company functions, such as HR, Finance, product management and marketing. Doing so encourages awareness across the organization of potential risk, compliance, or other legal issues. An outside law firm can add value to the mission by providing a client-facing application providing details on case progress and budget, reducing effort on the part of the legal operations team to keep the executive team and colleagues informed.
|Technology and Processes
Providing legal services in-house is increasingly a technology based effort, so client legal teams need to align with IT resources, both internal and external, to create and implement software and processes that enable the legal department to execute on its plans.
Outside law firms who embrace legal operations principles can contribute to clients' successful internal technology implementation. Working with the corporate client, they help create a long-term technology roadmap to support the client's goals. Investments in e-billing, matter management, contract management, enterprise content management, IP management, legal hold, and other core legal processes help law firms provide a higher level of service and better real-time information to manage their business.
In some cases a firm may participate in defining requirements for technology projects, and helping to select products or service providers. Some large law firms are investing significant resources in technology, setting up subsidiaries and joint ventures specifically focused on creating variety of technology-based legal products and services. In 2019, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati launched SixFifty, a wholly owned software subsidiary created to develop automated legal process tools. Law firm Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe has invested in Reynen Court, a new platform for law firms and corporate legal departments looking to select and use new legal tech tools.
|Conclusion
The practice of law is first and foremost an information business, and technology is helping to transform legal operations, both in corporations and the law firms they rely on. The first few years of the legal operations movement in the industry have shown us that most corporate clients want to increase collaboration with their law firms. A shared commitment to communication, collaboration and legal operations methodology can help that happen. Law firms have a significant opportunity to foster closer partnerships with clients, increase their value contribution, and enjoy enduring relationships by adopting legal operations approach in their practice.
Megan Miller, CEDS, is a senior consultant with Edge Legal Marketing, assisting clients in development and execution of strategic marketing plans and implementation of marketing technologies. A global technology hound, Miller has built brands, trained teams and introduced successful products for global companies and startups. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250