E-Discovery Providers Don't Get Cut Any Slack with Collaboration Software Updates
Communications platforms like Slack or Microsoft Teams are spreading quickly across the corporate landscape. But can e-discovery providers keep up with how quickly those channels evolve or will they get left in the dust?
February 24, 2020 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
To paraphrase the great Ferris Bueller: Communications platforms move pretty fast—if you don't stop and look around once in a while you could miss something. It's not terrible advice for e-discovery providers who are regularly tasked with helping clients preserve data from rapidly evolving communications platforms such as Slack or Microsoft Teams.
But staying on top of the updates those channels are continuously making to their own framework requires the purveyors of e-discovery services to look around a little bit more often than "once in a while." In fact, providers may have to stay in near constant contact with their counterparts in the communication technology world as well as make some key decisions about where they want to focus their energies. It helps that corporate America is sending them a strong hint.
"We're doing Slack really well. We're focusing to make sure that we're handling that specific application really well but also making sure that we're understanding this new world of collaboration software," said Brad Harris, vice president of product at Hanzo.
That's probably not a bad instinct given the proliferation of those kinds of platforms inside businesses. Scott Bailey, director of client solutions at the e-discovery provider Prosearch, noted that Microsoft Teams took off rapidly when they introduced the tool within their own company walls. Other organizations are likely to do the same—without considering the e-discovery implications first.
"Their IT teams will release [Microsoft Teams] without fully understanding how it's going to explode," Bailey said.
Some companies are attempting to deal with the inevitable e-discovery collection to follow by developing their own tools internally, but that may be changing. Harris at Hanzo pointed out that the investment of time and resources required to update those tools is substantial, which could be driving more business towards external tools, and likewise, outside e-discovery providers.
But that doesn't necessarily mean that keeping pace with communications channels is any less of a challenge. E-discovery tech providers, for instance, need their platforms to be flexible enough to be constantly updated or changed, which Harris said is easier to do than it was 10 years ago thanks to advancements in software. Still, it's hard to be responsive if you don't know what needs changing in the first place.
"We have a shared [communications] channel between Hanzo and Slack where our development team, our product team, we're always chatting routinely with their partner team," Harris said.
But while Slack may be willing to dialogue with e-discovery providers, communications platforms still have their own set of business priorities. Julia Hasenzahl, CEO of Prosearch, said that while Slack has taken steps to anticipate changes that could raise collection issues, they certainly aren't going to delay the release of a product just to give people on the discovery side of the fence time to catch up.
Beyond the time constraints, there can also be varying perspectives on what is going to become vital to the e-discovery process. For example, Microsoft will occasionally offer Prosearch a preview of a new feature that's rolling out with an emphasis on some of the big ticket items or changes involved.
"But [there are] a lot of these little things that they don't consider significant, but unfortunately they might have pretty significant downstream effects from an e-discovery standpoint," said Bailey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250