Review: AdvoLogix Brings Matter Management to the Salesforce Platform
AdvoLogix centralizes all case information, automates customized workflows, manages critical dates and events, and allows legal professionals to collaborate on all aspects of matter management and client services.
February 25, 2020 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
Platforms are gaining popularity in legal. Legal organizations can lease or subscribe to integrated software or build their programs on platforms and not suffer from depending on a single vendor for services.
On the Salesforce Lightning Platform, the company's flagship CRM software is available with more than 5,000 apps in the AppExchange. These apps can extend other software on the platform, such as AdvoLogix, a web-based matter management offering since 2006, focused on Fortune 100 companies and midsize to large law firms.
AdvoLogix provided me a user account to demonstrate the software from December 2019 to January 2020. Most user experience is unique to AdvoLogix, which centralizes all case information, automates customized workflows, manages critical dates and events, and allows legal professionals to collaborate on all aspects of matter management and client services.
Users have access to other features related to the Lightning platform, such as building blocks to create apps and custom pages without coding (no code), prebuilt templates, and automatic processes to connect to third-party and legacy systems. There are Lightning apps for accounting, billing and invoicing, Salesforce CRM, and more.
AdvoLogix shares objects with the Lightning Platform, so data on accounts, contacts, events, and tasks in matter management are equivalent in Salesforce CRM and other apps on the Lightning Platform. To get started, all I needed was a web browser.
|Tester's Notes
AdvoLogix runs in any web browser. A user who can navigate a browser with basic knowledge of how search boxes, tabs, dropdown lists, and other navigation tools will speed your success.
The sticky footer in the UI provides access to quick links to everyday tasks, most recent tasks, multi-timers, a date calculator for deadlines, and an intake launcher. AdvoLogix supports configurable intake templates or forms to triage new matters via workflows.
All things revolve around matters in AdvoLogix. But one matter does not fit all cases. From the Matters tab, view cases with tabbed resources for matter details, documents, calendars, and financials in time, expense, and budgets.
I created new matters using forms organized by matter types, such as general litigation, immigration, investigation, tax, and tort. For example, general litigation has several form fields for key dates (engagement date, date responded, date filed, trial date, projected closure date, closed date) displayed in a timeline at the top of the matter. The litigation matter also has data for expected billings and settlement date, worst case settlement date and amount, estimated cost, and allocated time.
If a matter type did not have a field I expected, it was easy enough to add it with Salesforce's Object Manager tool and make it accessible to a matter type. The device also made it easy to edit and create matter record types using mouse clicks without coding. I created a matter for mergers and acquisitions with a workflow from investigation and due diligence to document review in a deal room.
Matters support process automation, which includes process approvals, flows, and workflows. Flows can automatically read and write data in fields, collect and display information, manipulate data, and execute business logic. Workflows can assign tasks to users or roles, update fields, send email alerts, and transmit secure outbound messages via an application programming interface (API) in XML format. I created an approval process for intake forms, legal hold notification alerts, and used Process Builder to make a legal hold process for matters—all using clicks and picks from drop-down lists and search results. Short of creating a process, it's easy to clone and edit one to get started.
AdvoLogix has built-in, essential document management and document assembly features, which are like the mail-merge features in Microsoft Word. The system uses the native document wrapper in Salesforce to categorize and organize documents by matter. Files can be accessed in the context of a workflow, previewed, and downloaded for review and edit. AdvoLogix lacks advanced features for checking documents in and out and version control. Customers can use third-party integrations from the likes of Box, Dropbox, and NetDocuments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250