DocuSign's Acquisition of Seal Software Was a Long Time Coming
With the acquisition deal. DocuSign can continue to build out the AI-powered capabilities of its Agreement Cloud suite, while Seal can satiate clients asking for a more end-to-end approach to contract management.
March 02, 2020 at 12:24 PM
4 minute read
The things companies will do for their Agreement Cloud suites. Last Thursday, e-signature company DocuSign announced that it had reached a $188 million cash deal to acquire contract analytics provider Seal Software, further solidifying the ongoing partnership between the two companies.
For years, DocuSign has been reselling Seal's agreement analytics solution as "DocuSign Intelligent Insights." In March 2019, the company doubled down on that relationship by investing $15 million in Seal with the hopes of adding Seal's AI-powered capabilities to its own Agreement Cloud suite, which focuses on contract preparation, signing and management.
Per Seal president Jim Wagner, that deal gave both companies the opportunity to ensure that their respective customers and products worked well together. "It's just been a natural evolutionary process," Wagner said.
According to Thursday's news release, that "natural evolutionary process" is expected to be made final in the first half of DocuSign's fiscal year, but has already been approved by each company's board of directors. Still, the more things change, the more they stay the same, and it appears that DocuSign's Agreement Cloud will continue to remain a core priority following the acquisition.
"While the reseller relationship with Seal was one thing, we wanted to do more. By acquiring Seal, it will be possible to integrate Seal's AI technology and value proposition across the entire Agreement Cloud. … And we will also benefit from Seal's deep technology expertise, and its broad experience applying AI to agreements," said Scott Olrich, chief operating officer at DocuSign.
The work springing from DocuSign's March 2019 investment in Seal has already provided some proof of concept. For example, the same AI that has propelled Seal's focus on contract analytics has already been integrated into the Agreement Cloud suite's auto-tagging feature, which automatically identifies where electronic tags should be placed on a document for items such as signatures or dates.
"Seal's technology will add a new range of AI capabilities, driven by advanced natural language processing, text analytics and semantic analytics," Olrich said.
To be sure, Wagner also sees the potential for the way contracts are managed to become even smarter moving forward.
"Seal AI can definitely help that happen, whether it's making decisions around risk, whether it's making decisions around who needs to see a contract and sign-off or whether it's making decisions around how a contract can be revised," Wagner said.
But Seal isn't the only automated player in the contract game. BlackBoiler, for instance, has a tool on the market that redlines any potential issues that exist inside a given a contract. A startup named Pactum also released its first AI-powered contract negotiation tool last September. But building the necessary workflows and interfaces—as well as the document ingestion required—presents a significant challenge to new players looking to move into the AI contract space.
While bringing Seal in-house could further boost DocuSign's ongoing efforts with regards to AI—which began in earnest with the company's 2017 acquisition of machine learning startup Appuri—the deal isn't a one-way street. Per Olrich, Seal customers will receive deeper access to the Agreement Cloud Suite, which could fit nicely with the demand Wagner sees among clients for a more end-to-end approach to contracts.
"The things that we do for our customers today, it's very common for those same customers to say, 'Hey, could you do just a little bit more? Could you help us to prepare our agreements? Could you help us on an ongoing basis to help manage those contracts?" Wagner said.
Speaking of those Seal customers, Olrich said DocuSign planned to continue selling the company's contract analytics application post-acquisition. As for how Seal's pre-existing employees will be folded into the company, those answers may not become clear until after the acquisition has closed. The same goes for Seal's ongoing partnerships with other organizations.
"The acquisition is expected to close in the first half of DocuSign's fiscal year, so we're focused on business-as-usual operations right now," Olrich said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250