DocuSign's Acquisition of Seal Software Was a Long Time Coming
With the acquisition deal. DocuSign can continue to build out the AI-powered capabilities of its Agreement Cloud suite, while Seal can satiate clients asking for a more end-to-end approach to contract management.
March 02, 2020 at 12:24 PM
4 minute read
The things companies will do for their Agreement Cloud suites. Last Thursday, e-signature company DocuSign announced that it had reached a $188 million cash deal to acquire contract analytics provider Seal Software, further solidifying the ongoing partnership between the two companies.
For years, DocuSign has been reselling Seal's agreement analytics solution as "DocuSign Intelligent Insights." In March 2019, the company doubled down on that relationship by investing $15 million in Seal with the hopes of adding Seal's AI-powered capabilities to its own Agreement Cloud suite, which focuses on contract preparation, signing and management.
Per Seal president Jim Wagner, that deal gave both companies the opportunity to ensure that their respective customers and products worked well together. "It's just been a natural evolutionary process," Wagner said.
According to Thursday's news release, that "natural evolutionary process" is expected to be made final in the first half of DocuSign's fiscal year, but has already been approved by each company's board of directors. Still, the more things change, the more they stay the same, and it appears that DocuSign's Agreement Cloud will continue to remain a core priority following the acquisition.
"While the reseller relationship with Seal was one thing, we wanted to do more. By acquiring Seal, it will be possible to integrate Seal's AI technology and value proposition across the entire Agreement Cloud. … And we will also benefit from Seal's deep technology expertise, and its broad experience applying AI to agreements," said Scott Olrich, chief operating officer at DocuSign.
The work springing from DocuSign's March 2019 investment in Seal has already provided some proof of concept. For example, the same AI that has propelled Seal's focus on contract analytics has already been integrated into the Agreement Cloud suite's auto-tagging feature, which automatically identifies where electronic tags should be placed on a document for items such as signatures or dates.
"Seal's technology will add a new range of AI capabilities, driven by advanced natural language processing, text analytics and semantic analytics," Olrich said.
To be sure, Wagner also sees the potential for the way contracts are managed to become even smarter moving forward.
"Seal AI can definitely help that happen, whether it's making decisions around risk, whether it's making decisions around who needs to see a contract and sign-off or whether it's making decisions around how a contract can be revised," Wagner said.
But Seal isn't the only automated player in the contract game. BlackBoiler, for instance, has a tool on the market that redlines any potential issues that exist inside a given a contract. A startup named Pactum also released its first AI-powered contract negotiation tool last September. But building the necessary workflows and interfaces—as well as the document ingestion required—presents a significant challenge to new players looking to move into the AI contract space.
While bringing Seal in-house could further boost DocuSign's ongoing efforts with regards to AI—which began in earnest with the company's 2017 acquisition of machine learning startup Appuri—the deal isn't a one-way street. Per Olrich, Seal customers will receive deeper access to the Agreement Cloud Suite, which could fit nicely with the demand Wagner sees among clients for a more end-to-end approach to contracts.
"The things that we do for our customers today, it's very common for those same customers to say, 'Hey, could you do just a little bit more? Could you help us to prepare our agreements? Could you help us on an ongoing basis to help manage those contracts?" Wagner said.
Speaking of those Seal customers, Olrich said DocuSign planned to continue selling the company's contract analytics application post-acquisition. As for how Seal's pre-existing employees will be folded into the company, those answers may not become clear until after the acquisition has closed. The same goes for Seal's ongoing partnerships with other organizations.
"The acquisition is expected to close in the first half of DocuSign's fiscal year, so we're focused on business-as-usual operations right now," Olrich said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
- 3The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 5What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250