A Texas Startup Thinks It's Solved the Client Outreach Dilemma for Plaintiff's Firms
MyAccident.Org, run by Andrew Higginbotham, provides people who had just gotten into wrecks a way to access their accident reports, but also a potential marketing opportunity for attorneys.
March 04, 2020 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
I am from Hidalgo County, an area that is in deep South Texas, which is often described as a Judicial Hellhole. This means that it is a particularly plaintiff-friendly area of the country. My late father was a plaintiff's attorney in Hidalgo County and he had many tales of how his fellow plaintiff's attorneys would craftily get clients. However, those crafty schemes and gimmicks would come to a grinding halt when Texas imposed strict Barratry laws.
For those who are not familiar with Barratry, it is the unlawful solicitation of clients. A good example of Barratry is an attorney coming to your hospital room after you have been in an accident and trying to sign you up. The current Barratry regime usually does not allow for unsolicited outreach (outside of some isolated incidents) to potential clients. This is a problem that has been a thorn in the side of plaintiff's attorneys for quite some time.
One startup out of Dallas, Texas seems to have figured out a workaround to this problem and in doing so is offering attorneys unprecedented access to potential clients. The startup is called MyAccident.Org and it is run by Andrew Higginbotham.
Higginbotham is not a lawyer himself—he is an entrepreneurial mind that noticed that his attorney friends had a hard time getting new clients under the current Barratry regime. It seemed that their only options to get more clients were to take out expensive ads or to engage in equally expensive fights for advertising space on websites like Avvo.com.
Unfortunately, those options proved to be both costly and questionably effective. So these attorneys still focused heavily on word of mouth. Higginbotham had made a significant amount of money making free credit report sites before the Dot Com bubble popped and saw an opportunity to make money in a similar way in this market.
He did this by syncing his website with publicly available (yet pretty hard to access and navigate) databases of accident reports and populated a map with all of the accidents that have happened with all the details of the accidents minus the names of the parties involved or any other personal information. People who had just gotten into wrecks need to access their accident reports in order to file claims, and his site gives people two options when accessing their reports on his site: 1. Locate and access your accident report via his site and pay a one-time fee of $20 or; 2. Consent to attorneys reaching out to you about your incident and get your accident report entirely for free.
This incentive, according to MyAccident.Org, not only serves as an excellent funnel to convert people into marketing leads for his company, but the consent portion of the two options provided serves as a workaround to Barratry. According to MyAccident.Org, once you have voluntarily come to their site and voluntarily consented to attorney's reaching out using the information that you provided, an attorney utilizing leads generated from this system should not bear Barratry liability.
To bolster their argument, they cite Comment 1 to Rule 7.03 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, which permits marketing via a website if it is accessed by an interested person and the information provided on attorneys is relevant and truthful, and Comment 5 to Rule 7.2 of the American Bar Association Model Rules for Professional Conduct, which states that "A lawyer may pay others for generating client leads, such as Internet-based client leads."
If their system does work as seamlessly as they claim it does within the law, it could be a gamechanger for plaintiff's firms across the nation, and the shockwaves of change would not be limited to car crashes. Damages from storms and other incidents that generate public reports would be low hanging fruit for their system and the next logical step for them.
Although we may never return to the old ambulance chasing days that my dad would describe to me as a kid, it seems that MyAccident.Org may have found a way to bring back the access to clients that plaintiff's attorneys had in the past with no fear that they may lose their license for reaching out to potential clients.
Samuel Garcia is a recent graduate of Harvard Law School and currently a Senior Associate at Amplo, a Venture Capital fund.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250