Improving the UK's Access to Justice Can Start with Legal Technology
In an overstretched legal system, technology will play a key role in levelling out the playing field by increasing the range of affordable options available for those who would otherwise have been priced out.
March 09, 2020 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
The English legal system has traditionally enjoyed a reputation for being 'the best in the world,' with a top-quality bar and independent judiciary and specialist commercial courts and arbitration services bringing lucrative international business into the country.
However, it is a system that is also significantly overstretched. The last decade has seen the legal aid advice network brutally devastated by funding cuts. Entire areas of law fall outside of the scope of publicly funded legal services. The severe lack of access to affordable legal assistance has led to senior judges warning that the quality of the entire system hangs in the balance.
|A Closed Shop
Fewer than 10% of people experiencing legal problems instruct solicitors, and with top lawyers charging up to £1,000 per hour, it is no surprise that two thirds of people feel that legal services are too expensive.
Nesta, the innovation charity, recently found that nearly 60% of people in England and Wales think the legal system is 'not set up for ordinary people'. Artificial Lawyer recently argued that, 'When half a country believes legal services are not for them, that seems to indicate a serious issue, perhaps even…a deficit in the democratic status of a nation.'
The situation is no better for UK businesses. Small businesses typically face 8 legal issues a year, yet 83% see legal services as unaffordable, preferring to go it alone instead. With huge fines at stake for failing to meet legal obligations, mistakes can be costly or even terminal to a business. SMEs find themselves in an impossible position—they struggle to afford traditional legal services but cannot afford to bury their heads in the sand either.
It is unsurprising that barriers to accessing quality legal assistance leave individuals vulnerable and businesses at risk.
|Technology Can Play a Vital Role
Whilst the justice system has often been slow to innovate, HM Courts & Tribunals Service is currently embarking on a £1 billion digital reform process which is working to overhaul the way justice is administered. Many court services have already been moved online and there will be a continued move away from paper-based systems to digital solutions.
It is not just the court system that is embracing technology. There are countless examples of innovations improving the way lawyers work too. Natural language processing is facilitating smarter legal research processes, e-discovery is cutting down on the cost of lawyers required to assist on large scale document review projects, digital contracts make the whole process more streamlined and cost effective and enable people to do business anywhere in the world without delay. These efficiencies can all be passed on to clients, resulting in the provision of a more affordable and thus, it is hoped, more accessible legal service.
Legal tech solutions are also increasingly being targeted at individuals who are more and more willing to do some of the groundwork themselves. Digital information and document platforms and chatbots widen the pool of options to which individuals have access. There will of course always be a need for specialist legal services, but improved processes and new ways to connect online with lawyers and legal advice without the overheads associated with the traditional law firm model will all help to keep costs down without having to compromise on quality.
|Law Tech is Big Business
The Ministry of Justice recently pledged to allocate £2 million in funding to Tech Nation, a scale up network for tech entrepreneurs, to help support the digital transformation of the UK legal sector.
It is a move that highlights the UK Government's commitment to ensuring the UK remains a global leader in law and legal technology.
The legal technology market is thriving with £1bn global investment last year. In the UK alone, investment into the sector has tripled in recent years, reaching over £62 million in 2019.
With the UK legal tech market growing fast, it is estimated that embracing new technological developments could double productivity growth and begin to close the justice gap.
|Improving Access to Justice?
The issues around access to justice are of course complex and the solution will not be found through technological innovation alone. Technological solutions still need to be accessible and by their nature require a level of tech literacy that cannot be expected of all members of society. Technological innovation is not a panacea for all the issues affecting our justice system.
However, in an overstretched legal system, technology will play a key role in levelling out the playing field by increasing the range of affordable options available for those who would otherwise have been priced out.
Anna Simmonds is a barrister and Head of Commercial at Sparqa Legal, an online platform providing expert legal guidance and auto-generated documents for businesses. Founded by a team of senior barristers and tech executives, Sparqa Legal is on a mission to make law accessible and empower businesses to fulfil their own legal needs. The content in this article is up-to-date at the date of publishing. The information provided is for information purposes only, and is not for the purpose of providing legal advice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250