Knock, Knock? Tech as the Legal 'Front Door' Will Be the Big In-House Theme in 2020
Deloitte Legal's Bruce Braude and Tim Wistow argue that businesses are increasingly turning to technological solutions to present a legal front door to the firm itself.
March 10, 2020 at 08:13 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Both legal service providers and in-house functions have shown an increased interest in legal technology over the last decade. The former have tended to use technology to improve service delivery internally whilst, externally, client-facing portals and new online services have been introduced with the aim of enhancing the client experience.
For the majority of in-house legal departments, the implementation of new technologies has tended to focus on improving the overall function. In these instances, the technology has typically included aspects like e-billing solutions, to better understand and manage legal spend, as well as matter management platforms and contract lifecycle management tools to oversee contractual processes and obligations.
Aside from a few exceptions, there has been little focus to date by in-house legal functions on their clients' experience of legal processes. This is now changing, and GCs and Legal COOs are increasingly turning their attention to the 'legal front door'.
If a front door acts as the main entrance to a house, then a 'legal front door' plays a similar role in being the primary way for a business to access its legal department. In essence, it is a platform that enables business users to log legal requests with the in-house legal department, but it can encompass a lot more.
Self-service examples include Frequently Asked Questions, intelligent systems and bots for answering queries, contract generation and even access to the organisation's contract repository and associated contractual obligations.
Whilst some have been using the legal front door for years, for many in-house legal departments it is still an emerging trend. In both cases, businesses are now exploring its various technologies, which may range from using existing corporate intranet platforms, legal matter management platforms with built-in service request portals or existing help-desk type tools.
|Opportunity Knocks…
There are a number of problems and opportunities that the front door concept seeks to address but there are also clear benefits, regardless of what side of the 'door' you are on.
In an increasingly digitised and 'always on' world, business users often want to access their company's lawyer as quickly as possible. Indeed, rather than simply resorting to sending an email or trying to get hold of them on the telephone, users want immediate service.
A legal front door system will enable them to log requests through a self-service portal, with minimal effort and human interaction. This will help resolve issues faster, resulting in obvious productivity and resourcing benefits.
The adoption of a portal also has the ability to provide business users with data transparency, using real-time status information on their legal requests. This is in contrast to users' experiences to date, which can be opaque, confusing and therefore less efficient.
There are also a number of benefits for in-house legal departments, not least due to the fact that a legal front door that includes self-service elements will free up lawyers' time so that they can focus attention on more complex issues rather than having to deal with routine queries.
Additionally, the front door acts as a filter, meaning that requests can be properly captured and directed to the most appropriate individual within the legal team. This is far more efficient than manually having to pass requests to the right person.
Perhaps the most significant benefit, however, is around how the front door allows for detailed information to be captured and analysed relating to the legal requests in the business. Such valuable information can be used to improve the service and identify trends and emerging legal risks facing the business.
This in turn will help GCs and legal teams inform C-suite colleagues to make appropriate, insight-led business decisions, further demonstrating the value that the legal department brings to the business.
The efficiency opportunities are apparent when looking at how similar portals have benefited other industries. In one front door implementation undertaken by Deloitte for a global retailer's HR function, 20% of service interactions were able to be resolved with no human involvement.
In another case, a 25% increase in service request volume was able to be handled with no increase in team size. These are considerable savings that can be translated through to a legal function with relative ease.
|Getting a Foot in the Door
Whether using existing platforms within the organization, or adopting entirely new technology, there are a number of business factors that need to be considered before getting the keys to the legal front door.
A key consideration will be the platform's functionality: will it be used for simply logging requests or will it include more sophisticated self-service elements? Understanding what data that the platform will capture and how it can be effectively analysed will be particularly important.
In addition, internal communication and education sessions will certainly be required in order to get buy-in from employees who will be using the system regularly and may be reluctant to change. A phased roll-out may be required to smooth any teething problems, and so certain parts of the business will need to be prioritized.
Fundamentally, it is worth remembering that the implementation of any new technology into an organisation can be make-or-break depending on how 'useable' it is, particularly if it integrates with other platforms and systems that the business already uses.
Adopting a legal front door will be a defining trend of the next few years for in-house legal. It has the potential to significantly enhance the service experience that a business receives from its legal department, evolve the legal department to become more insight-led within the business and deliver material improvements in service levels and efficiency.
It also has the potential to contribute to the data-oriented approach to managing the legal department, most likely already underway with the various in-house legal management technologies discussed above.
Bruce Braude and Tim Wistow are CTO and legal technology consultant at Deloitte Legal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs International Regulation of AI Moving in the Right Direction or Moving at All?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250