Georgetown Law Unveils New Tech-Policy Degrees as Regulations Clash With Industry
Georgetown Law launched a new master of law (LL.M.) program for lawyers and a master's degree for nonlawyers to equip them with the knowledge to better navigate the new regulatory landscape of emerging technology.
March 12, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
From massive data breaches to controversial data gathering, technology is evolving rapidly. But how such advancements fall under current regulations can pose a myriad of complex questions.
Georgetown Law wants to train future lawyers and nonlawyers to help navigate this area.
On Monday, the Washington, D.C.-based law school announced a new Master of Laws degree (LL.M.) in technology law and policy, as well as a similar master's degree for nonlawyers both scheduled to start this fall.
Alexandra Givens, a Georgetown Law professor and founding executive director of its Institute for Technology Law & Policy, said the degrees were needed as tech evolves rapidly and organizations grapple with existing policy. Noting Georgetown Law currently offers various tech law courses, Givens said the LL.M. "is intended for people that want to specialize in that type of law."
The LL.M. program will focus on teaching attorneys how to address new legal, ethical and societal questions that appear alongside tech development and deployment. Those budding challenges include information privacy law; First Amendment law in the digital age; the law of ethics and automation, AI and robotics; health information technology; and other issues.
Meanwhile, the new master's program won't require a law degree or tech background but it will include truncated courses explaining constitutional law, contracts and torts and other similar 1L courses, Givens noted. Like the LL.M. program, the master's program will also include courses detailing information privacy law, governing emerging technology, law enforcement utilizing technology, and surveillance and competition policy challenges in technology.
Participants in the LL.M. and master's program will take 24 credits during a one-year full-time enrollment or take two to three years if completing the program part time.
The need for the new LL.M. and master's program was sparked by student and market demand, Givens said, noting that elected officials and government agencies are seeking counsel to update tech law and regulation. Indeed, a federal lawmaker last year noted the stalemate over a national data privacy law wasn't due to partisan politics, but partially stemmed from lawmakers not understanding technology well.
Likewise, businesses and public interest organizations are seeking advocates who can address new legal, ethical and societal challenges that arise from technology, she said.
And, as companies develop and leverage advanced technology, law firms are bolstering their ranks with lawyers that can offer regulatory insights and counsel clients through the evolving landscape. A 2019 article in The Recorder found many Big Law firms are building their cybersecurity and data privacy practice groups with lateral hiring from competing firms and recruiting from government agencies. Givens said it's a hiring need that also includes nonlawyers in congressional and regulatory agencies, which is why Georgetown Law developed a master's program for nonlawyers.
To be sure, many U.S. and England-based law schools have implemented courses concerning legal tech, including Columbia Law School and a Brigham Young University-University of Arizona collaboration. New York-based Albany Law School and the SUNY Polytechnic Institute also launched an "innovation clinic" last year to bring law school students and tech majors together to develop, patent and commercialize tech.
Still, most law schools don't provide a separate degree regarding technology. However, that may change. Given the market demand, Givens said the need for specialization concerning tech and its interaction with policy in the field won't go away any time soon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250