For Legal Services Industry, Europe Travel Ban Brings Little Disruption
A European travel ban intended to curtail the spread of the coronavirus in the U.S. may have a limited impact on the ability of legal tech companies and alternative legal service providers to operate internationally. But the real threat could be the toll the virus takes on a business' workforce.
March 16, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
The COVID-19 pandemic is already making its impact felt on the legal tech market. On Friday, a 30-day travel ban preventing foreign visitors out of Europe from entering the U.S. officially went into effect, which means that legal tech companies could find themselves pushing their own internal use of remote collaboration tools or communications platforms to the next level.
Chris DeConti, head of strategy at legal managed services business Factor, said that as of Monday all company employees were told to begin working at home, a total that amounts to about 500 people spread across locations like Belfast, Northern Ireland; London; and Wroclaw, Poland. It was one step on a broader business continuity plan that Factor has been ramping up over the last few weeks as the impact of the coronavirus continued to grow.
"We had to attend to some basics like making sure that everyone had a functioning laptop and just a little bit of housekeeping, but we had this business continuity plan in place and this is probably the most thorough test of it or real life application of it," DeConti said.
But not every legal tech company is ready to ask their employees to start working from home yet. Liam Brown, chairman and CEO of Elevate, said the company's immediate response to the European travel plan was to make sure that any foreign nationals that needed to return to the United States did so. Brown indicated he's attempting to take a "measured" response to the pandemic—if people need to work from home to care for themselves or a loved one, they can.
As for the day-to-day operations of the company itself, it doesn't sound as if the travel ban will impose much disruption. Elevate has a distributed headquarters that isn't concentrated in any one geographic location, and the company also maintains service centers and hubs around the world, including Europe. How the virus will ultimately impact the ability of that workforce to continue servicing clients is difficult to predict.
"Do I think there will be customer impact? I think there will be some but I think it will be marginal. It'll really be more about individuals having to care for their families because schools or closed or look after their elder parents that they are worried about," Brown said.
Meena Heath, chief marketing officer of the legal services provider QuisLex, shared similar concerns about how employee health would impact the infrastructure of different companies around the globe. Still, the travel ban itself should not pose any significant threats to the way QuisLex conducts business. While company representatives will occasionally meet with clients face-to-face in an effort to build relationships, the majority of their interactions are conducted over various communications platforms.
"At the moment what I'm seeing in the legal market generally is it's perhaps less the legal tech side and more the actual [law] firms where they've got people going into offices where they've got the switch to make," Heath said.
But that doesn't mean that all companies have escaped unscathed by the travel ban. AbacusNext recently opened a new office in London and was planning to send a representative from the company's San Diego office to help get the operation on its feet. Those plans, along with a scheduled product summit to meet and greet various employees and partners stationed around the globe, have been cancelled.
"We now are creating a series of meetings all online using Microsoft Teams software, using Google meeting software. … We'll record each of them, we're creating transcripts of them and then making sure that's part of the information that we share," said Tomas Suros, global product marketing director of legal at AbacusNext.
Of course, it's worth noting that the travel ban doesn't just impact legal tech companies, but how clients engage with their products. Jake Heller, CEO of Casetext, said that clients living in fear of an overall economic downturn have already begun reorienting their conversations with the business around various automated solutions that can help defray costs.
For legal tech vendors this could equate to some new opportunities and even newer customers. Heller mentioned that Fortune 500 companies in particular were looking for places to trim expenses—including legal. "We've especially worked with a lot of large law firms in the past, but I think that the more interesting group for us right now is the in-house corporate counsel," he said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250