More U.K., U.S. Firms Rolling Out Global Remote Working in Virus Response
Five more international firms are the latest to enact remote working measures after a flurry earlier in March.
March 16, 2020 at 07:38 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
Editor's Note: This article was first published in Legal Week, ALM's publication for U.K. legal news.
Dechert, King & Spalding, Clifford Chance, Allen & Overy and Slaughter and May are the latest firms to roll out global working from home policies in the wake of further disruption by COVID-19.
Dechert sent a memo to all its people on Friday to "encourage all personnel to work from home on a full time basis", effective immediately, according to a person with knowledge of the situation. Its offices are still operating with reduced staff.
The firm had previously introduced a restriction on non-essential business travel, the person added.
King & Spalding has also told all of its staff to work from home for a period of two weeks, but has stopped short of closing its offices, according to a person close to the matter, with staff still able to go in if needed. In London, the firm has also launched a Covid-19 working group and has set up a rota for secretarial support, the person said. Fee-earners have been asked to use the firm's virtual private network, while secretaries will use a 'virtual desktop'.
Meanwhile Clifford Chance has recommended that its staff work from home, though the offices remains open for the time being, a spokesperson for the firm said.
The spokesperson added in a statement: "Our primary focus is on ensuring the health and wellbeing of all our staff and their families. We have established business continuity procedures in place for all our offices around the globe which include working remotely.
"These procedures and our advanced and well-embedded agile working technologies and policies, ensure that clients will continue to be serviced as seamlessly as possible even when a significant proportion of our people are working away from the office."
A person at the firm added that, while the firm's teams in the Asia Pacific region are already working remotely, its "U.S., European (including U.K.) and Middle East offices will also be working remotely". They added: "All offices continue to be operational and to provide a high level of support to our clients."
Last week, the Magic Circle firm ran a two-day remote working test in its London office to ensure that staff could access their systems and to familiarise them with a home-working environment.
Fellow Magic Circle firm A&O too has said it is "strongly encouraging" its London-based partners and other staff "to take advantage of its existing flexible working arrangements to work from home for the next few weeks in response to the spread of Covid-19″, according to a statement.
The firm added that all its lawyers and "most support staff" are able to work remotely "using secure, tried and tested technology". It added that it was keeping the situation under review and has introduced various different working arrangements in other offices.
Like several other firms, A&O has since March 1 had international travel restrictions in place, has cancelled larger meetings, and encouraged the use of technology. The firm added: "The welfare of all A&O people and our clients is our priority."
Slaughter and May has also joined the procession of top firms asking their staff to work remotely. In a statement, the firm said that it has asked staff to work from home "where feasible to reduce overall numbers of people in the office and traveling to work".
The statement continues: "Our teams are well set up to work remotely and our office remains open. These arrangements will apply initially until Friday April 3, and we will keep the situation under review."
A number of firms have now widened their remote working protocols in an effort to stem the spread of the virus.
White & Case is allowing its London lawyers and other employees to work remotely this week, according to a spokesperson at the firm. According to one person with knowledge of the matter, the firm will be reviewing the remote working order on a weekly basis as advice on handling the coronavirus outbreak in the U.K. develops.
U.K. firm Macfarlanes has also informed its staff that it will be "permitting people to work from home more extensively than usual", the firm's senior partner Charles Martin told Law.com International's Legal Week on Friday. Fellow U.K. outfit Simmons & Simmons has also closed its London office today.
Meanwhile Reed Smith's workforce began working remotely Friday, according to a firm spokesperson.
With reporting by Hannah Roberts.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250