Coronavirus and E-Discovery: How COVID-19 is Testing Business Continuity for Service Providers
Keeping our people safe from a global pandemic without interrupting service delivery is not an easy task. However, there are actionable solutions that can be put in place to enhance your business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
March 18, 2020 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
Every SaaS provider has a written business continuity and/or disaster recovery plan in place to ensure minimal service outage or downtime in the event of a global health emergency. These plans are reviewed periodically and may even undergo simulation testing, but now, the coronavirus (COVID-19) is putting SaaS providers to the test. The good news is that the e-discovery world is in many ways more prepared than ever to handle a global health crisis.
Software, datacenters and service providers are dependent on people. People manage infrastructure, run collections, image phones, process data and review documents. Due to the highly contagious nature of COVID-19, it is critical that we pay close attention to the evolving recommendations provided by the CDC and local governments. Quarantine and similar measures of precaution have the potential to disrupt the global economy, and e-discovery is no exception.
Software as a Service
Running a large-scale, highly available software environment requires a healthy, and, often onsite, IT team. IT personnel play a critical role in operational health, often putting out fires and solving critical issues that directly impact service delivery. However, while service providers are proud of their ability to support large-scale, sophisticated software environments, they typically invest more staff and resources in client-facing services than IT. When a server, or team member, is unhealthy, there is little the client-facing team can do to save the day.
When it comes to business continuity, the cloud offers key advantages over an on-premise model. First, working from home will likely pose a greater challenge for company IT departments than it will for Microsoft's army of more than 40,000 IT engineers. More importantly, cloud deployments typically offer a largely automated ecosystem capable of identifying and solving problems without human intervention, auto-provisioning resources, cycling servers and alerting IT staff when necessary. Moreover, a cloud deployment is less vulnerable to interruptions caused by a pandemic, as it is inherently designed to be more self-sustaining (i.e., less human-dependent) than traditional non-cloud deployments.
Document Review Centers
At no point do more people congregate in the same room during the e-discovery lifecycle than during a document review. Dozens to hundreds of reviewers gather in large open spaces Monday through Friday, sitting in close proximity and often using devices shared by multiple shifts, making document review centers a perfect venue for the transfer of a highly contagious virus. Outside of a pandemic, there can be advantages to onsite (versus remote) review. Onsite review offers direct eyes-on oversight of people and technology, which is sometimes required for highly sensitive projects. However, during a pandemic, it would be difficult to design a better petri dish for the spread of COVID-19 than a large-scale review center.
As a result, it's critical that companies transition their teams to a remote review model. Fortunately, remote-capable review environments are getting more affordable, and cloud security controls more robust. For example, industry-leading cloud platforms offer robust access management control, detailed audit trailing of user activity, and high-level encryption of data both in transit and at rest.
Even major health institutions, including Mayo Health Systems, have embraced remote review for medical coding and transcription services, which require HIPAA compliance. As an added bonus, remote reviews generally allow service provider to pass-on cost savings to their clients through lower hourly review rates.
Onsite Collection
Collection has historically been the most high-touch of all phases in the EDRM. In a typical scenario, one or more forensics experts, armed with their favorite portable imager, flies to a client's office and harvests data from more than 50 desktops, email systems, cell phones and network shares. Then, he or she transports the data back to the lab for processing, review and production. COVID-19 presents two major challenges to onsite collections.
First, some employers have transitioned to a work-from-home model, although such measures have not yet been recommended by the CDC. As a result, the 50 target devices for collection could be located at 50 different personal addresses, making the project a logistical nightmare of coordinating meetings with each custodian. Second, many companies have put a moratorium on air travel until at least April 1, which limits the examiner's ability to collect onsite.
Here, again, we as an industry are better positioned than ever to adapt to a remote model. While email and O365 are table-stakes for remote collection, targeted collections from desktops, network shares and even iPhones can also be performed remotely using commercial off-the-shelf imaging software. What once was an arsenal of physical collection devices, portable imagers and wire-harness kits, is now being replaced with centralized, enterprise-level collection software, remotely connecting to hundreds of endpoint devices across an organization.
In such deployments, collections can be performed by a remote examiner from his or her office, and can target custodial devices regardless of their physical location, at home or in the office. During a time of social distancing, when on-site collection may not be possible, a remote collection strategy is essential to keep data flowing downstream for review and production.
Takeaways
In an industry driven by automation, our human workforce has become more important than ever. Keeping our people safe from a global pandemic without interrupting service delivery is not an easy task. However, there are actionable solutions that can be put in place to enhance your business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
To future-proof your e-discovery operations, it is recommended that you: (1.) Leverage the cloud to increase resiliency and security, (2.) Utilize remote collection more broadly, and (3.) Promote remote review to your clients. Service providers are truly better equipped to handle a global health crisis than ever, as long as we are willing to adapt and embrace change. Oh, and wash your hands and stop touching your face!
Benjamin D. Sexton is Vice President of eDiscovery and Analytics at JND in Minneapolis, where he advises corporations and law firms on deploying the proper policy, process and technology to meet discovery goals and reduce risk. JND is a RelativityOne Certified Partner. He can be reached at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250