Coronavirus Outbreak May Also Put Attorneys at Greater Risk for Cyber Infection
With many law firms working remotely due to the coronavirus, attorneys may be prime targets for hackers and phishing campaigns looking to take advantage of the disruption.
March 18, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
As the novel coronavirus pandemic has continued to unfold across the U.S., law firm chief information officers are being confronted by a new reality where remote working is par for the course—and cyberthreats are knocking directly at their attorneys' front door. Last week, BBC News reported that hackers are taking advantage of the health scare to attach malware to faux reference materials and other deceptively legitimate resources that people may be seeking out.
For law firm CIOs, the immediate threat isn't to the network infrastructure or cybersecurity mechanisms they have in place, but to the partners, attorneys and other human resources who, for the time being, are no longer working under the same roof. Some have already witnessed attempts by hackers to capitalize on the pandemic firsthand.
"Now is a time where people need to be even more vigilant. We've seen phishes noting 'COVID-19 Update, Open Immediately' or 'click here to see updates about coronavirus'; that type of thing," said Jim McKenna, CIO at Fenwick & West.
His isn't the only firm to notice an uptick in phishing activity. Neeraj Rajpal, CIO at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, said that some of the suspicious activity he's noticed isn't even centered around health-related news. Rather, hackers are aware that a wide number of firm employees are working from home, without peers or CIOs around to remind them that a seemingly friendly email could be a trap designed to lure them into forfeiting money or personal information.
In prepping for the impact that COVID-19 would have on business operations, Rajpal noted that the firm's cybersecurity infrastructure was already in strong position. Instead, their efforts have been directed toward fortifying the human element of the equation, whether it's through reminder emails or encouraging people to revisit previously issued training materials.
"We literally sent an email out this morning just reminding people that in this climate you should be extra careful, so we're just doing an extra bit so to speak," Rajpal said.
Part of the challenge is that not all emails bearing "coronavirus" or "COVID-19″ in the subject line are a threat. Richard Rosensweig, a director in the litigation group at Goulston & Storrs, indicated that he'd been averaging between 30 to 40 emails a day with updates about the coronavirus, many sent from courts, vendors and clients.
As a precaution against hackers attempting to take advantage of the confusion, the firm has instituted a wire-fraud prevention policy that requires employees to rely solely on prevetted telephone numbers to confirm instructions rather than emails or text messages. "It's very easy to open up an email and just respond to it when you are not in the office and you are not surrounded by the people that you are normally working with," Rosensweig said.
But in the absence of peers and co-workers, firms may have to be more creative about how they remind employees to think carefully about the email in their inboxes. Over at Day Pitney, for example, CIO Kermit Wallace said the only "technical" security change the firm has made in response to the coronavirus is to update the color of the external email notification banner found at the bottom of communications originating from someone outside the practice. The brighter hue is intended to serve as a reminder of the potential danger lurking just around the corner of every unfamiliar email.
Still, it's not just email scams that firms have to be worried about. For instance, some attorneys may be visiting unofficial Facebook groups to find out more information about school closings or activity cancellations, and Wallace pointed out that it's easy for a bad actor to slip an infected link into those forums. "We've also reminded people that if they have signed up for notifications to just make sure it's coming from where you think it's coming from," Wallace said.
It seems likely that attorneys at every firm should expect the reminders will keep rolling in as the coronavirus pandemic continues to unfold, especially if law offices must continue operating remotely. "COVID-19 presents sort of an ideal atmosphere for [bad actors] to pray on law firms because our work patterns are disrupted," said Rosensweig.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAvantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readAI Gives Legal Departments New Leverage to Demand Speed, Efficiency From Law Firms
3 minute readIn-House Gurus Say Inattention to Human Side of Tech Adoption Can Derail Best-Laid Plans
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250