In-House Counsel Don't Think They Have the Resources Needed to Comply with Privacy Regs
FTI Consulting's latest survey on privacy found that although 97% have increased their data privacy budgets, a majority of in-house counsel say they do not have the resources to become compliant with newer data privacy laws.
March 18, 2020 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Many companies feel they do not have the resources necessary to comply with the growing list of regulations surrounding data privacy.
That was a major finding in FTI Consulting's latest "Corporate Data Privacy Today: A Look at the Current State of Readiness, Perception and Compliance" survey published on Tuesday. The survey indicated 60% of respondents do not have the resources to become compliant with newer data privacy laws.
In the survey, FTI Consulting says it reached out to more than 500 leaders of large, U.S.-based companies, with 60% of respondents holding titles in senior management or the C-suite and 28% holding middle-management roles.
"When it comes time to deploy and implement the appropriate data privacy controls within your organization, you need to have the right subject-matter expertise and the ability to deliver upon the obligations under the law in a way that makes sense for your business," said Andrew Shaxted, senior director at FTI Consulting in Chicago.
The tight job market, he said, is making it difficult to recruit people with expertise from their current jobs. He said in-house counsel need to step up because data privacy is now part of all business functions.
"The expectation of in-house counsel as far as that baseline understanding of data privacy compliance obligations should tick upward," Shaxted said.
He added that when companies are selecting new software to manage data they should involve the legal and compliance teams early on to mitigate the "cost and risk of onboarding new solutions."
|Increased Budgets for Privacy
Whether it is on compliance efforts or finding new talent to navigate cybersecurity and data privacy initiatives, many companies will be increasing their data privacy budgets in the next year. According to the report, 97% of respondents will increase their data privacy budgets by an average of 50%.
"With the California Consumer Privacy Act coming into force, organizations are going to feel the pinch for resources needed to comply. This will include large companies spending in the range of $1-2 million on establishing and maintaining compliance," Jake Frazier, senior managing director of FTI Consulting in Houston, said in the report.
The pressure to spend more comes partially from the scrutiny companies are facing for how they use personal data. From the survey, 60% of companies agreed there have been increased expectations on how data is managed.
"I think that also speaks to the nature of change taking place in the broader organization where personal data is becoming more and more integral to their work and therefore the cost of compliance is going to tick up," Shaxted said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250