System Error: The IT Issues Plaguing Attorneys' Transition to Remote Work
As more attorneys work remotely during an unprecedented pandemic, limited network capacity, internet speed slowdowns and other technical issues may hinder their workflow.
March 19, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
As COVID-19 continues to force more attorneys to work remotely, many are finding working from home isn't a simple transition for the uninitiated. Besides balancing work-life and juggling child care at home, tech challenges can also further complicate attorneys' daily workflow and potentially disrupt billing.
For some, remote work can ultimately mean slower connections.
"A lot of firms have some capabilities around it [remote access] but they don't have all the capabilities they need," said Terry Dohrmann, chief revenue officer of cloud-based practice management platform Litify. "We've spoken to some firms that have remote access into document management, but it's done through an older VPN model and the speeds are super slow."
Dohrmann noted attorneys are "used to working on the same server beside their colleague. Now they are VPNing, [and] the function is a lot more clunky and peoples' frustration levels are rising."
Along with slower speeds, providing additional VPNs and access to collaboration platforms to staffers and lawyers can take time.
"If firms have not prepared for this, they need to work quickly to increase capacity for technologies like VPN or Remote Desktop to accommodate demand," said Matt Coatney, chief technology officer of HBR IT Managed Services. "But all those activities could have a time lag. It could take days or weeks to get new hardware and licenses," he noted.
Along with connection issues, observers noted that some law firms don't have the electronics needed to handle the levels of remote work now needed.
"One of the large issues I've seen speaking with some folks and leaders in the industry is they just don't have enough computers available for their workforce to take home of enterprise-quality," said Timothy Bowers, managing partner of VLP Law Group, a cloud-based law firm.
Additionally, law firms need to verify if their staffer or lawyer's internet connectivity is sufficient to run the programs needed, he added. If the transition to remote work isn't smooth and staff and lawyers need persistent assistance from IT, business disruptions may occur.
"Inevitably they will lose billable hours trying to get their network up and running to the level it was in their office," Bowers said.
Tech and security experts stressed an established remote working plan avoids a last-minute scramble and likely follow-up complications when quickly implementing software and training. Still, even for law firms acclimated to working remotely, this new reality brings some new questions.
Take Pennsylvania-based personal injury and worker's compensation firm KBG Injury Law, for example. Though it has leveraged remote access working capabilities and provided laptops to lawyers and staff previously, the prospect of government-mandated shutdowns and ongoing quarantines means the firm may need to go fully virtual.
"There will be certain aspects of the business we will have to be creative about. For example, mail," Kline said. "Fortunately in this day and age, paper mail has dropped dramatically but there still is some." The firm has explored forwarding the firms' mail to an employee's home and the employee scanning it into KBG's document management system.
Similarly, KBG also receives paper-based settlement checks from insurance companies that the firm and potentially the client are required to endorse. Pennsylvania law is unclear if online notarization is sufficient, Kline said, but alternatives to in-person notarizing would likely be considered if COVID-19 continues to disrupt normal business operations.
Still, for many firms this may be a "trial by fire" to determine if they are equipped to handle infrastructure stress or if other solutions are needed to secure data and provide legal services, Kline said.
"There's now an ethical obligation for a basic level of tech competency, and I think for some firms they are finding out if they satisfy that requirement or not. Most firms are, but I'm sure some are not," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250