On-Premise Tech's Swan Song? Pandemic Places Greater Emphasis on the Cloud
The market demand to develop cloud-based legal tech solutions will only grow as more lawyers and staffers become acclimated to working remotely.
March 20, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Cloud-based legal technology has spent roughly the last five years highlighting its benefits and pushing back against the notion that it's an ethical or security liability. Now, as more legal professionals shift to substantially working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, more legal tech companies are likely jumping on the cloud bandwagon.
"What you will probably find working in the time of corona, more people will become more used to [working remotely] and more comfortable using it, it won't go away," said Hogan Lovells head of innovation and digital Stephen Allen. "The trend we have seen in the last three or four years of being cloud accessible will be nudged along the line more."
For legal tech companies, now could be the worst time to release an on-premise-only legal tech tool. Luckily, the expectation is many will go a different direction.
"Because of the coronavirus, they will all move online, and in legal tech if you are not able to provide a cloud-based solution with remote access … then lawyers simply aren't going to want to use them," said Allison Daly, marketing vice president of cloud-based legal tech platform LEAP Legal Software. "What good is a practice management system that you have to go in the office to use and you can't get to the office?"
LEAP is one legal tech provider that recently added cloud-based features in response to a growing need for remote access to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. Last week, the legal practice management platform announced users can purchase, train and install its cloud software remotely.
Daly said the new feature wasn't a client demand, but a business decision to allow law firms to run their business smoothly without risking their safety.
Still, although LEAP's latest features were inspired by the coronavirus, Daly said she doesn't think the development and adoption of cloud-based legal tech solutions will wane after the coronavirus outbreak ends.
"I think this has made it crystal clear that all industries need to have the ability to work remotely at any given time," she explained. "None of us could have seen this coming. It is an emergency situation, and because of that they have to have remote laptops and remote solutions for their law firm and business. After a crisis, people will know they will need this."
Developing cloud-based services is part of a larger push to provide the additional services people need, said Kimball Parker, president of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's software developer subsidiary SixFifty.
Parker noted SixFifty's GDPR and CCPA compliance platforms were designed on the cloud to work in an evolving workforce, though not necessarily for working through a disaster. "We didn't anticipate a COVID pandemic, but we did anticipate people would want to access this from not just their desktop."
He added, "Just building this on premise wasn't an option. It cuts out a signification portion of the market."
Still, Nicole Black, lawyer and legal tech evangelist for case management platform MyCase, noted that it's not just legal tech companies without cloud platforms that may feel the need to change their technology during this outbreak.
While on-premise software companies will have to spend valuable time building a cloud infrastructure, cloud-based legal tech companies may have to develop tools to solve new obstacles faced by their clients, such as gaps in their cloud or remote services, she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250