Are Savvier Communication Tools Helping Firms Compete Against ALSPs?
Collaboration platforms can help law firms stay top of mind in a marketplace crowded with ALSPs, placing a heavy emphasis on real-time, nonverbal client communications.
March 26, 2020 at 12:00 PM
5 minute read
Communication is the cornerstone of any good relationship, and law firms may be expanding their horizons beyond email. Some, for instance, are implementing platforms that allow them to communicate more fluidly with clients.
Fostering more open dialogues could prove to be especially important considering the competition that firms are facing from alternative legal service providers (ALSPs) or the Big Four, who may be more practiced at keeping their customers in the loop.
Among the firms changing how they communicate with clients is Mayer Brown. The firm has taken to using a series of web-based portals to create a repository of data or information pertaining to a matter or event that can be constantly updated as the situation evolves. It also allows lawyers or their clients to upload and exchange documents.
Several of Mayer Brown's portals were constructed using the vendor HighQ, a provider of cloud-based file sharing, team collaboration and social networking software. The firm can then go in these portals and install custom-built features or dashboards. Portals can also be made open to the public or stay strictly between law firm and client. "It's more secure, it gives only certain people use and it has living tools in it," said Mayer Brown partner Elizabeth Espin Stern.
Not to be outdone, Day Pitney rolled out a new "knowledge management solution" earlier this month geared toward helping its private equity group "disseminate knowledge" about events and other goings-on among its client base. The firm configured the project internally using the cloud-based collaboration tool Microsoft SharePoint as a development platform.
Kermit Wallace, chief information officer at Day Pitney, framed communication platforms as a way to expand the firm's existing footprint with a client amid a competitive legal marketplace. "To the extent that we can stay top of mind with a client by communicating effectively about things that are maybe directly related to the work that we're doing with them or potentially related to our areas of expertise within the firm that maybe they haven't engaged us in so far, that's absolutely an area that we continue to look at," Wallace said.
However, adopting collaboration platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Slack or even a custom-built solution can pose risks to a firm if not implemented with the right security guards, and that same danger may not be as acutely felt by ALSPs.
"They are coming at it from a stronger position. And they don't have the barriers that we have. Yeah, they have the confidentiality clause, but it's not the same fiduciary duty of confidentiality that attorneys have with their clients. We could lose our license if there's a breach of client information," said Tomu Johnson, of counsel at Parsons Behle & Latimer and CEO of the firm's tech subsidiary Parsons Behle Lab.
He pointed out that most firms don't have the resources to build their own secure platforms from scratch. Johnson's own practice group uses the external project management and communications platform Basecamp to communicate with clients, something that distinguishes them from every other practice at the firm.
He argued that law firms in general have historically not been very adroit at communicating ongoing matter developments with clients, with regular status updates still something of an industry rarity. "Oftentimes, the only interaction that a client will get from the law firm is the monthly bill," Johnson said.
That stands in contrast to an ALSP or a new law company such as Legility, which uses a laundry list of widely available collaboration tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Yammer. According to Legility CEO Barry Dark, the timing and frequency of communications is something that is mutually agreed on with clients depending on the "project specifics and preferences."
To be sure, not all communication between legal provider and client is strictly verbal. Legility also uses a proprietary solution called Spotlight, a dashboard-type feature that provides clients with access to real-time business data. "This is a key communication channel that allows clients to access data in a consumable format when and where they need it. This type of real-time, nonverbal communication has generally not been available in traditional models," Dark said.
It may be the speed at which life—and technology—moves that continues driving law firms toward alternate communications platforms. Beau Mersereau, chief legal technology solutions officer at Fish & Richardson, doesn't think it's competition with ALSPs that is responsible for driving more firms to embrace platforms such as Slack or Microsoft Teams. Instead, he attributes that development to shifting consumer habits influenced by the technologies that attorneys and clients alike are engaging with in their home lives.
"It's very easy to have video conferences with your family and just talk on your iPhone that way, and I know that our attorneys want that same ease of use," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250