Can AI Alleviate Contract Management Headaches?
Artificial intelligence-powered solutions have the promise to simplify how you manage your contracts without digging through filing cabinets and manual systems.
March 26, 2020 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
|
From request to retirement, contracts have a complicated path through your organization's systems. If your contracts are still sitting around in spreadsheets and file cabinets, you know how hard it is to lay your hands on the contract you need, when you need it, wherever you are.
As you look to update your contract lifecycle management (CLM) system, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered solutions promise to simplify how you manage your contracts without digging through filing cabinets and manual systems. It's an exciting time to explore CLM solutions but finding one that uses AI effectively can be a challenge.
|Contractually Speaking
Legal professionals often experience frustration around CLM systems. They want a better solution, but they're wary of current technology and their ability to reliably manage compliance and mitigate risk. There are three issues that consistently arise when discussing CLM.
1. Difficulty collaborating: Legal professionals involved with contracts run the gamut from in-house legal department lawyers to IT managers to procurement officers. They all want a CLM system that allows for ease of collaboration between departments, all without sacrificing compliance and risk management. When departments can't collaborate effectively, the chances are high that they simply will not collaborate at all, further siloing how each department manages and tracks contracts.
2. No single source of truth: Organizations run into trouble when they have contracts scattered in spreadsheets or file rooms. There's simply no way to tell if they're looking at the most updated version of a contract. However, considering the risk involved in having multiple versions of binding legal documents, consolidation is the only viable solution. It's important to remember that, since every department handles contracts differently, they should all be consulted for successful consolidation.
3. AI skepticism: AI is, according to seemingly every pundit, the next big thing. That means almost every tech company is bound to talk up their "AI technology," but how do you know who's really on the cutting edge, and who's not?
|AI: The Cure for CLM Blues?
CLM presents a special challenge. Paper contracts, multiple clauses per contract, and complex versioning are all factors, but AI is up to the challenge. So, what does an AI-enabled CLM solution need to truly alleviate the problems surrounding contract management?
First, to find any contract, clause, or keyword in an instant, the solution needs optical character recognition (OCR). OCR capabilities allow legal professionals to search for contracts instantly by recognizing metadata from scanned documents, such as contract amount and renewal date. With AI-based OCR functions, the CLM system reads contracts and converts them into data that organizations can easily access and at the point of greatest need.
The second capability of an AI-driven CLM system is a conversational interface using natural language processing (NLP) with tools such as Alexa. Conversational interfaces utilize voice commands to boost productivity and allow hands-free connectivity. A voice-based AI integration lets users' interface with the CLM system directly, including search, reading, or editing fields and records as well as counting. For example, users can simply ask, "Alexa, how many contracts are due this month?"
The third way AI assists legal CLM is with risk scoring. AI risk-scoring can help organizations manage risk and maintain compliance. Once companies configure the desired risk-level formula, an AI risk-scoring tool can quickly review documents and flag risky clauses and contracts for further review based on the company's preferences. In addition, AI can collect data and recommend actions on types of clauses or contracts.
Finally, we can't forget about machine learning. Machine learning allows organizations to "train" AI-powered solutions to perform custom functions using popular machine learning models from Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. If this sounds complicated, it doesn't have to be. Ideally, training a new algorithm for machine learning can be accomplished with a few mouse clicks at most. With machine learning in a CLM system, organizations can, for the first time, make predictions and use them to automate workflows.
Colin Earl is the founder and CEO of Agiloft, a Silicon Valley pioneer in no-code development platforms for business applications and contract and commerce lifecycle management (CCLM).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 2Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 3How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
- 4People in the News—Dec. 30, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Buchanan Ingersoll
- 5Orange Belongs to All: U-Haul Suit Argues Rival Public Storage Cannot Claim the Color
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250