Epiq's Client-Facing Systems Back Online After Ransomware Attack
In late February, Epiq took its global systems offline after being hit with a ransomware attack. Now systems are back up and running with "hardening measures" around the company's cybersecurity.
March 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM
2 minute read
All of Epiq's systems are officially up and running again. The e-discovery and managed services company had taken its global systems offline in late February after detecting "unauthorized activity" that an investigation later revealed to be a "Ruyk" ransomware protocol attack.
According to a statement posted to the company's website on Thursday, the cybersecurity firm Mandiant found no evidence that any client data was accessed or exfiltrated. "There has been no evidence of malicious activity in our system since March 1, 2020, and the attack did not impact our backup systems or data," read the statement.
In March, Epiq revealed the specific business elements impacted by the Ruyk ransomware attack, including the company's Restructuring and Bankruptcy, Class Action and Mass Tort and Legal Solutions components. According to the Center for Internet Security, Ruyk is a type of crypto-ransomware that blocks access to a system or file to extort payment via Bitcoin. It's typically dropped into a system via the banking trojan TrickBot, which Epiq also acknowledged finding evidence of inside its systems.
To contain the spread of the threat, the company took all of its global systems and data centers offline. Each system was then tested and brought back online one-by-one with assistance from Mandiant, IBM and Microsoft. As of March 19, Epiq indicated it had restored access to over 90% of its client facing systems.
Meanwhile, partners were not immune to the outages. For instance, shortly after news of the Epiq attack first broke, Shawn Gaines, VP of marketing at Relativity, confirmed to LTN that Epiq-hosted instances of Relativity had been impacted.
Now with Thursday's announcement that all systems have been restored, Epiq appears to be focused on what's next. The company said it has worked closely with Microsoft and IBM to implement additional "hardening measures" to improve the security of its network.
"We have learned a great deal from this incident, including that no company is immune to increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks in today's dynamic threat landscape, and we are committed to sharing key lessons learned in the coming weeks," Thursday's statement read.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250