COVID-19 Cools Legal Tech Investments, But Long Term Prospects Remain Strong
Venture capitalists expect slower investments in legal tech during these uncertain economic times. But they still believe the overall trends for legal technology will soon lead investors back to the industry.
March 27, 2020 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
COVID-19 is not only causing medical problems in the U.S., it's also stoking economic uncertainty and less consumer spending that's led to a bear market for investors.
The downturn arrives after a record-setting year for legal tech investments. Now, venture capitalists say to expect slower investments in legal tech as most investors are likely to become more cautious in the coming months.
"I think in times like this when you see an equity crunch, people are more disciplined, regardless of the type of business. Whether legal tech or fintech, we are expecting to see that," said Mark Buffington, co-founder and managing partner of venture investment firm BIP Capital.
Buffington's company on March 11 announced that it invested $1.5 million in Case Status, a client relationship management and marketing software for law firms, during the cloud-based platform's second seed round.
Still, despite the natural reaction to become more conservative with investments during economic uncertainty, Buffington believes the overall trends for legal technology will eventually lead investors back to the industry.
Buffington pointed to the legal profession's late adoption of tech and its need for efficient workflows as market factors that should draw investors.
"I think those are the longer-term trends driving investments. Anyone serious about investing in the legal tech space will leverage opportunities like the COVID-19 virus as an opportunity to invest at decent prices," he noted.
Significant declines in individual markets aside, venture capitalists are also impacted by government-mandated self-isolation measures.
"VCs aren't on airplanes, we aren't meeting companies at the same level we used to," said San Francisco-based Touchdown Ventures principal Alex Nwaka. "I think in general that is going to cause challenges to get capital out of the deal, I think the activity will decrease because of the pandemic," but not necessarily deplete funding.
In turn, investors will be more discerning, Nwaka said. When looking at potential investments, investors will spend more time evaluating a company's "cash burn rate." Similarly, "cash runway" will be more top of mind for investors, which Nwaka described as the company's cash balance divided by the company's operational profit.
Despite closer inspection before providing funding, Nwaka didn't predict draconian days for all legal tech companies, noting that worthwhile startups would attract funding.
However, David Holme, CEO of legal outsourcing services provider Exigent and legal tech evergreen fund Bright Minds Capital Partners, stated that many in legal tech won't survive venture capital's higher expectations.
"The demands have gotten higher," Holme said. "I wouldn't say that for all … there are bright spots, but for the most part, I would say two-thirds of legal tech startups that have come to investors in the past two years are in for a very difficult time."
Mismanaged companies and "zombie companies" injected with capital despite a slow adoption of technology by legal professionals won't fare well in a bear market, Holme explained.
To be sure, venture capitalists contacted by Legaltech News said that the COVID-19-caused economic downturn is unlike the Great Recession of 2008.
"Once this pandemic starts to subside and China is going back to work, you will see people resume normal activities," BIP Capital's Buffington said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250