Amid Increasing Remote Work, E-Discovery Contends With an Overstretched Internet
E-discovery professionals working from home have to contend with overstretched bandwidth and slowing internet that hamper large data transfers.
April 01, 2020 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
While the COVID-19 pandemic may be causing some aspects of life to come to a standstill, the wheels of e-discovery continue to turn—albeit a little more slowly than they did before. To keep workflows running on schedule, e-discovery vendors may find themselves having to take a more hands-on approach in helping their homebound workers navigate an increasingly crowded information superhighway.
Wendy King, a senior managing director in the Discovery practice at FTI Consulting, referred to e-discovery professionals working remotely as "the last mile," otherwise known as the final leg in the delivery of information. "We're being mindful of the fact that things are going to take a little bit longer because of the fact that folks are going to have to work 100% remote now," King said.
And it's not just the e-discovery industry. Last week, the New York Times reported that the surge of internet traffic that has accompanied the many stay-at-home orders being issued by state governments is causing download speeds and video quality to lag. This is of particular importance to e-discovery though, where high volumes of data and even video are par for the course.
David Greetham, vice president of e-discovery at Ricoh USA, illustrated the problem as a tale of two bandwidths. Office environments typically favor dedicated bandwidth, which is ring-fenced to ensure that it is reserved solely for one subscriber or business. It's usually more expensive than shared bandwidth, which is most commonly used in residential homes. That method splits a specific segment of bandwidth among multiple users, such as family, roommates or even neighbors.
For that reason, shared bandwidth isn't an ideal medium for key e-discovery functions such as data transfers, a task where Greetham has already noticed some slowdowns. "The problem tends to be on the client end if they are trying to do it from their domestic location. If they are remotely accessing their office and initiating some transfer from their office from their commercial bandwidth to our commercial bandwidth, we're really not seeing much of a problem."
As a precaution, Ricoh is urging employees to avoid scheduling data transfers between 9:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Eastern Time, when they've found traffic to be heaviest. Early afternoons and evenings have yielded fewer issues. Once client data is in Ricoh's possession, the rest of the process has been moving smoothly.
Fortunately for the company's workflows, many appear to be transferring data by accessing their office's dedicated commercial bandwidth remotely instead of relying entirely on a segmented household or "domestic" internet connection. "We have not changed our estimated time of completion, because in most cases we've seen that commercial data transfer rather than domestic," Greetham said.
Still, e-discovery professionals that only use their domestic connection may have bigger problems than just scheduling transfers. Raj Chandrasekar, chief technology officer at Consilio, said that it may be wireless networks rather than the internet itself that are causing slow-downs, arguing that there aren't enough Wi-Fi channels to process all of the traffic generated by multiple devices operating in a single household or neighborhood.
He suggested that physically connecting a computer or device to a modem may be the most prudent course of action. "You've got much less or no signal interference not to say better security because you're using wired connections rather than a wi-fi," Chandrasekar said.
But that may not help with the traffic-related slowdowns he's noticed on video conferencing platforms like Zoom. Consilio leverages video conferencing as part of its document review service to verify the identities of employees working remotely and ensure that they are working from a secure location. The drain streaming video has on bandwidth—not to mention the competition from Netflix feeds—is not lost on Chandrasekar, who suggests people temporarily forego 4K definition for something more standard.
"Simple things that we can do in working with people to try and educate them have been a big part of this exercise," Chandrasekar said.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome': DOJ Proposes Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250