As lawmakers tackle protecting consumers’ data, many often turn to the requirement for “reasonable security,” which usually can be a vague threshold for private industry to meet. But plaintiff and defense attorneys agree, offering a more granular definition of reasonable security can also risk being overly proscriptive and easily outdated.
For instance, a recently proposed federal law, written by the bicameral and bipartisan Cyberspace Solarium Commission, risks inching toward being overly restrictive while too vague for compliance for many, defense attorneys said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
