Novel or Not, Law Firms Developing COVID-19 Tools to Stay Relevant
Many law firms have been deploying web portals, trackers and other tools to help clients manage COVID-19 concerns. But is it worth the effort?
April 06, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
In the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak, law firms have wasted little time deploying tech solutions geared toward providing clients with real-time information around the spread of the virus and various state and federal containment mandates. But with similar information widely available through the media or even government channels, are those efforts worth a law firm's investment as either a client service or marketing initiative?
To be sure, there are definitely some practical benefits to be gained by firms using technology to parse the deluge of COVID-19-related information. Crowell & Moring, for instance, repurposed a client-facing, cloud-based knowledge management platform to help its own attorneys.
Teams tracking COVID-19 response efforts inside each of the 50 states funnel a constant stream of updates into the tool—new shelter-in-place orders or business shutdowns, for instance— which can then be leveraged by the firm's various practice areas as they advise clients directly on handling the virus.
While attorneys could seek out every individual newscast, tweet or other primary source of information on their own, doing so would be time-consuming and potentially detract from client service.
"It allows us to give attorneys the ability to access information quickly and efficiently so that they can do the really important stuff that our clients are really seeking from us, which is that next-level counseling," said Kay Kim, senior director of practice innovation at Crowell & Moring.
Other firms are positioning COVID-19-related tools directly toward clients and the general public at large. In late March, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld launched an interactive map that provides users with information on business closures and stay-at-home orders on a state, county and local level.
The tool is part of the firm's broader COVID-19 Resource Center, which is updated regularly with legal insights and analysis. While clients may be able to find information on business closures or stay-at-home orders from the media or other sources, Josh Teitelbaum, senior counsel in Akin Gump's public law and policy practice, thinks the nuance and analysis a lawyer can provide makes a difference.
"I think clients look to their lawyers for a greater precision and accuracy and nuance than perhaps they might from the popular media. Which isn't to say that a lot about what you would find about these orders is inaccurate, but it may not be the whole picture," Teitelbaum said.
But making COVID-19 tools available to the public isn't just about trying to flood the market with sound legal analysis.
Brett Burney of Burney Consultants thinks there is heavy marketing component involved as firms look to navigate a world that is increasingly dominated by developments around the virus. "I see it as a way for firms to continue to stay relevant right now. Everybody is nervous. Everybody is anxious about exactly what is going to happen," Burney said.
Still, there may be some question around whether web portals and tracking tools are the most effective delivery method. Burney would like to see more firms deploying video to provide a more intimate repository of COVID-19-related information than a blog or web portal.
Queries such as "how am I going to pay my credit card bill" could provide the backbone of an entire short video, with an attorney speaking directly into camera. "Record yourself answering those questions right now and put it out there, because those are the questions that everybody is asking right now," Burney said.
And the delivery method firms choose for their COVID-19 response matters. While nobody may fault law firms for wanting to stay relevant during a crisis, that doesn't mean that people will tolerate an obvious headline grab. Zach Abramowitz, a consultant in the legal technology space, said law firms should try to be intentionally empathetic about the legitimate problems clients are now facing before launching any COVID-19 initiatives.
"I think when you're following a different equation of how can we use COVID-19 as either a marketing opportunity straight up or a product opportunity, I think people see through that pretty quickly," Abramowitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250