Firm Downsizing Likely Won't Fuel Talent Migration to Legal Tech, ALSPs
A large job migration within the legal ecosystem is unlikely to materialize as many legal tech companies and ALSPs aren't in a position to boost hiring.
April 08, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The legal industry is still adapting to the impact levied by the outbreak of COVID-19. But many organizations, including law firms, have already taken steps to try and soften the economic blow. Firms such as Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle have already cut associate salaries by 25%, while others such as Clayton Utz have instituted hiring freezes, or—in the case of Cullen & Dykman—begun the process of laying off and furloughing attorneys.
For out-of-work law firm attorneys, legal tech companies and alternative legal service providers can potentially serve as other sources of employment. But don't count on seeing a massive redistribution of human resources within the legal ecosystem any time soon.
Kimball Parker, CEO of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's tech subsidiary SixFifty, posited that law firms are more prepared now than they were for the recession in 2008, which may put some of the large-scale firms in a stronger position than others in the legal field to absorb the fallout from the novel coronavirus.
"[The workforce] could be redistributed back into firms just as easily as away from firms. … I could easily foresee a situation where firms fare better than legal technology companies," Parker said.
It's not that there's a lack of utility for attorneys working inside legal technology companies. Having lawyers on staff can provide legal tech companies with immediate feedback from the audience who will eventually be using their products.
"I think it's one of the reasons we see attorneys either getting hired [by] or starting legal tech companies, because they have some of the insights already in their head and no other attorney is slowing down to help anybody else see the problem," Andrew Whelan, vice president and law firm segment leader for CT Corp. at Wolters Kluwer, told LTN last year.
However, the economic impact wrought by COVID-19 might leave legal tech companies in no position to make those hires. Legal professionals are continuing to leverage technology such as remote conferencing software or knowledge management platforms to help keep business flowing, which may be helping to shift lawyers' overall attitude toward tech adoption in a more positive direction. But law firm and corporate belt tightening could still hit legal tech hard, with some companies already taking precautions.
On Wednesday, Bloomberg Law reported that Elevate was enacting 10% salary cuts across-the-board, while legal app-store Reynen Court's senior executive team will be taking 20% salary cuts and instituting a freeze on new hiring.
"In the short term, I think [COVID-19] is going to have a pretty devastating effect on the industry," Parker said.
There may be a few exceptions in such niches as legal research, where smaller companies may benefit from firms beginning to turn away from larger, more expensive legacy competitors. E-discovery could also have some spots available for job-seeking attorneys. Parker indicated that during the recession of 2008, many attorneys found work performing document review.
What's more, ALSPs could potentially offer a similar employment outlet for lawyers having trouble finding work.
Alternative legal services provider Axiom is continuing to hiring attorneys, with senior vice president of lawyer talent John Erban noting a slight bump in applications from earlier in the year. Erban thinks that even beyond COVID-19, in-house legal departments will have to reconsider how they restructure their legal teams, potentially relying on outside law company assistance should internal head count dwindle.
Where the work goes, so could the lawyers. "You're going to see more people continue to come to Axiom to be employed, and you are going to see more demand for places like Axiom as the result of legal departments doing what we're talking about," Erban said.
However, that may not be the case for every ALSP out there. Zach Abramowitz, a consultant in the legal technology space, pointed out that not all ALSPs are staffing companies such as Axiom and may not be looking to hire attorneys. It's also worth noting that these law companies could also be feeling the economic impact of COVID-19.
"Not all ALSPs are necessarily recession-proof. Will companies that took private equity funding in the last five years and have already been consolidating and 'eliminating redundancies' be in a position to hire? That is not clear. The private equity funds may already be looking for liquidity opportunities," Abramowitz said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250